The impact on patients as doctors vote to strike

Thumb_lawrence-mcginty
The BMA argues that higher paid NHS staff already pay proportionately more for their pensions than most other public sector workers
The BMA argues that higher paid NHS staff already pay proportionately more for their pensions than most other public sector workers Photo: ITV News

So for the first time in three decades, doctors have voted to take industrial action. The issue, their pensions.

They say doctors will have to work longer (to 68) and pay more (14.5 per cent of salary for senior doctors) for their pensions. The "final salary" scheme is to be replaced by a "career average" pension.

The vote is emphatically in favour of strike action:

  • 63 per cent of GPs
  • 73 per cent of consultants
  • 81 per cent of junior doctors

Two huge "buts" here.

First the turnout was 51 per cent.

That's not bad for a ballot on industrial action but the BMA Council, which is meeting today to consider what action to take, might just decide it's not enough to go ahead. I doubt it.

Second, the "strike" they voted for is very limited. Doctors will turn up at work as usual. They will handle all emergency and urgent cases. They will not treat patients when it is not urgent. In advance, they will postpone those appointments. So go to A+E and you WILL get treated. Go to your GPs for a travel vaccination and you'll be given an appointment for later.

BMA Headquarters in central London
BMA Headquarters in central London Credit: ITV News

Doctors feel strongly about their pensions being slashed as they see it, but clearly don't want to take any action that would alienate public support. The government says OK, your pension won't be as good but the country is facing financial problems and the population is getting older and older.

Everyone will have to share the pain and doctors will still be retiring at 68 on a pension of £50,000 which is not too shoddy.