The family of murdered Belfast solicitor Pat Finucane dismissed the report into his death by Sir Desmond de Silva as "a sham...a whitewash....a confidence trick", and renewed their calls for a public inquiry into the murder.
The Prime Minister told MPs in the House of Commons that the de Silva review into the murder concluded there was "no overarching state conspiracy" but "shocking" levels of state collusion. Political Editor Tom Bradby reports.
The de Silva review found a number of agencies of the state were involved in the murder, and subsequent cover-up, of the death. The RUC police force and the Army came in for particular criticism, as the report found that more 85% of UDA/UFF intelligence originated with sources within the security forces.
- Members of the RUC "proposed" Mr Finucane be selected as a murder target
- They took "no action whatsoever" to prevent the planned attack
- The was a failure to investigate and arrest key members of the West Belfast UDA after the attack
- Members "seriously obstructed" the criminal investigation
- The Army had information on a series of planned UDA attacks through their informer Brian Nelson, but did nothing with the information
- The army "must take responsibility" for Nelson's "targeting activity", including Mr Finucane during 1987-1989
- Senior officers lied to criminal investigators
- The Army and MoD officials provided the defence minister with "highly misleading" and in parts "factually inaccurate" information about the handling of informer Brain Nelson
David Cameron apologised to the Finucane family for "an appalling crime" saying the degree of collusion exposed was "unacceptable"
Mrs Finucane said she accepted Mr Cameron's apology but suggested he had little choice but to offer one.
He is a human being. He probably does think it is an atrocious act. But unfortunately he is quite removed from Northern Ireland or what went on in the late '80s.
So maybe it isn't very hard for him to apologise. I will give him the benefit of the doubt and accept the apology but it doesn't go far enough because I don't really know what he is apologising for.
Her son Michael, also present when his father was shot 14 times in the face by UDA/UFF gunmen, said the report did not provide much new material to the family.
He said the review did not reveal any new information on the "culture" of protecting intelligence sources during the 'Troubles' even if there was a "human cost."
Why is there this great fear by the British establishment to go examining the case of Pat Finucane in public?
It's because they have stuff to hide. It's because they don't want people being questioned in public.
He also said there were "probably hundreds of others" killed in similar circumstances.