We have found that examiners acted properly, and set the boundaries using their best professional judgement, taking into account all of the evidence available to them. The June boundaries have been properly set, and candidates' work properly graded. _The issue is not the June, but the January boundaries. Again, examiners used their best judgement in setting these boundaries, but they had less data and information to work with.
Most candidates were not sitting at the time, they were waiting for June, and because they were new qualifications, examiners could not rely so much on direct comparisons with the past. As a result, those grade boundaries were set generously. We have thought carefully about what should be done, and spoken with external assessment experts about it. Our job is to maintain standards over time, so grades awarded are comparable from one year to the next.
More top news
A murder investigation has been launched after a man was fatally stabbed and another injured in an apparent attack at a house in York.
Two former pupils of murdered teacher Ann Maguire have cycled 300 miles to raise money for a charity set up in her memory.
A memorial stone will be unveiled today at the spot where an explosion killed 27 miners at Maltby colliery in 1923.