We have found that examiners acted properly, and set the boundaries using their best professional judgement, taking into account all of the evidence available to them. The June boundaries have been properly set, and candidates' work properly graded. _The issue is not the June, but the January boundaries. Again, examiners used their best judgement in setting these boundaries, but they had less data and information to work with.
Most candidates were not sitting at the time, they were waiting for June, and because they were new qualifications, examiners could not rely so much on direct comparisons with the past. As a result, those grade boundaries were set generously. We have thought carefully about what should be done, and spoken with external assessment experts about it. Our job is to maintain standards over time, so grades awarded are comparable from one year to the next.
More top news
A police officer has told the Hillsborough inquests he didn't feel he had received any specific direction on the day of the disaster
A sergeant in charge of officers policing fans at the turnstiles was taken "out of action" for an hour before the kick-off to write reports.
NHS England has set out a new set of standards for congenital heart disease services.