The lawyer representing Jersey Police at the Independent Care Inquiry has asked the panel to forewarn the force if it's to be criticised.Read the full story ›
Lawyers representing Jersey Police say Lenny Harper was "ill-advised" to lead the 2008 investigation into historical child abuse.Read the full story ›
The States of Jersey Police has formally denied they were ever involved in a cover up of child abuse in the island.Read the full story ›
The police officer who took over Jersey's child abuse investigation in late 2008 has spoken of the culture of bullying and mistrust he found when he joined the force.
Mick Gradwell is today summing up evidence to the inquiry into historical abuse in the island.
Officers complained to me about the bullying culture in SOJP [States of Jersey Police]. Thousands of children's files had not been reviewed.
The working relationship between the lawyers and SOJP didn't meet the standards of the time. There was a public narrative that there was an active conspiracy to cover up child abuse.
He told the inquiry that Operation Rectangle was not run to the standards of the time that the UK's 43 police force followed, and that the senior investigating officer prior to his arrival, Lenny Harper, was not qualified to lead such a serious situation.
He said Mr Harper perpetuated an impression of mistrust in prosecutors.
Mr Gradwell said of Mr Harper:
The States of Jersey Police media narrative reinforced this view of mistrust. Instead, better attempts should have been made to rectify this view. There were divisive splits within the police, and between the police and other agencies.
He also criticised a BBC journalist who asked Mr Gradwell for an interview prior to him starting in the job in September 2008.
He said it was apparent the journalist was in possession of leaked information from the investigation, and that he didn't report impartially the information he was subsequently provided with.
Mr Gradwell said: "He interfered with my ability to properly investigate during this inquiry."
He also made reference to the way the investigation into what were presented as remains of children were announced to the public earlier that year by police in February 2008.
He said: "Evidence presented as partial remains of a child, not potential partial remains of a child. What was thought to be a piece of a child's skull should not have been presented in this exaggerated manner."
He said the totality of irregularities he found in the overall inquiry were not within the expected standards.
The advocate representing the States of Jersey has told the inquiry investigating historical child abuse in the care system that the response to the issue in recent years "stands ahead of other jurisdictions".
Advocate Beverley Lacey is today giving the government's closing submissions to the inquiry before it writes its final report.
Jersey is neither unique nor alone in confronting these issues and in trying to work out how best to protect and do the best for our children.
A number of inquiries are now underway around the world. This does not make the historic failings in Jersey more excusable or any lessons that need to be learned less important.
There are challenges and anomalies peculiar to Jersey as an island and relatively small community. Currently, one could say that Jersey stands ahead of other jurisdictions in its responses to survivors' accounts.
On behalf of the government, she outlined the number of police investigations into abuse in recent years, the official apology made by the Chief Minister in 2010, and the financial compensation scheme for those who were abused in States residential care.
The inquiry today also heard that in the past 18 months, Children's Services has reviewed its caseload and the way it works.
It means the number of current "looked after" children and children on the protection register has increased.
Related court cases now account for 20% of all the work dealt with by the island's Royal Court.
Advocate Lacey also reiterated to the inquiry that:
The States of Jersey are not waiting for the inquiry's recommendations. They know there are improvements and changes required and are focused on, and working to, resolve them.
Lawyers representing the States of Jersey have today issued a fresh apology to victims of historical child abuse in the island.
Today, the inquiry into wrongdoing within the care system has heard closing submissions from the government.
Advocate Beverley Lacey, representing the States, said: "The Chief Minister apologised to victims in 2010. It acknowledged failings on behalf of the States of Jersey and that horrendous abuse had previously taken place. It was equally heartfelt then as it is now."
She went on to characterise evidence from abuse victims as "nightmare accounts of children who have been groomed and subjected to sexual abuse by individuals in positions of trust."
The inquiry today also heard about changes and improvements that have been made to the care system, in advance of the inquiry reporting its findings and conclusions.
Under the banner of Preventative Services, an extra £5.5million is to be spent this year, and on a recurring basis in future years on:
- 20 new social workers
- 29 additional residential childcare officers
- 4 new family support workers
- 5 new post in the CAMHS service
- Additional funding for fostering and for individual packages of care for specific children.
In summing up the States submission, Advocate Lacey said:
The States of Jersey wishes to extend its gratitude to the survivors of abuse for their bravery in coming forward to the inquiry to give their accounts and who have contributed to the important work of the inquiry.
A group that represents victims of abuse in Jersey's care system say they are "surprised and concerned" by a damning report into the Independent Jersey Care Inquiry.
Last week, the island's Data Commissioner claimed there is evidence the Inquiry team have breached the personal privacy of victims and abusers.
The Care Inquiry team say no formal complaints were made to the Data Commissioner regarding mishandling of data.
The Jersey Care Leavers Association (JCLA) said the Inquiry team must be allowed to complete its work into historical child abuse in Jersey.
Following the publication of the Data Commissioner's report the JCLA's position is that the IJCI [Independent Jersey Care Inquiry] must be allowed to complete the task it was set by the SOJ.
The JCLA is surprised and concerned by the nature and timing of the Data Commissioner's report.
The JCLA trusts that the issues (valid or otherwise) raised by the Data Commissioner are comprehensively and expeditiously addressed by her and the IJCI.
The Independent Jersey Care Inquiry claims no formal complaints were made to the Data Commissioner regarding their mishandling of data.
In a damning report the island's Information Regulator claim there is evidence the Inquiry team have breached the personal privacy of victims and abusers.
The Inquiry team have also been accused of being unwilling to accept criticism or any help to improve their data protection processes.
In response to the accusations the Inquiry have criticised the regulator for not allowing them to see the draft report before it was submitted to the Chief Minister. They say it contains 'many inaccuracies'.
It is a matter of regret that the Inquiry did not have sight of the draft report prior to it being submitted to the Chief Minister as this would have allowed the many inaccuracies in the report to be corrected at an early stage. No formal complaints have been made to the Data Commissioner. The Inquiry is satisfied that the data protection systems in place are as robust as is required in handling sensitive material.
The Chief Minister says he 'can't guarantee' the States will act on Care Inquiry recommendations.Read the full story ›