The Mayor’s team are proposing to introduce an ultra-low emission zone in the city centre, which it says has the potential to deliver dramaticbenefits in air quality. Boris Johnson also hopes it'll spur on mass take-up of zero and low emission vehicles.
The Supreme Court has ruled the Government is breaking the law by not cutting air pollution levels in several cities including London. Levels of the toxic gas nitrogen dioxide currently breach EU limits in the capital and campaigners say the Government should be doing more.
But the Mayor's office says emissions are down:
“Airquality in the capital is taken extremely seriously and strenuous efforts arebeing made to improve it. Since the Mayor took office emissions ofdangerous particulates (PM10) have fallen by 15% and of oxides of nitrogen by20% thanks to an ambitious package of measures including building Europe'slargest fleet of low emission hybrid buses, retiring the oldest taxis andintroducing tighter emission standards for lorries and vans.”
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs insists the UK's air is safe after a landmark ruling that the Government is failing in it's legal duty to protect people from the harmful effects of pollution.
“Air quality has improved significantly in recent decades and almost all of the UK meets EU air quality limits for all pollutants.”
“This historic ruling marks a turning point inthe fight for clean air and will pile the pressure on Owen Paterson. Faced withcourt action on two fronts, he must now come up with an ambitious plan toprotect people from carcinogenic diesel fumes. Until now, his only policy hasbeen lobbying in Europe to try and weaken air pollution laws.”
“TheSupreme Court recognised that this case has broader implications for EUenvironmental law: The Government can’t flout environmental law with impunity.If the Government breaks the law, citizens can demand justice and the courtsmust act.”
ClientEarth is an environmental lawyers organisation that brought the case to the Supreme Court. It comes after the Court of Appeal declined an application for judicial review of the Government's plans to improve air quality.
Today Lord Carnwath JSC backed ClientEarth's case, ruling the Government is breaching article 13 of the EU Air Quality Directive.
A government spokesman said: "We have already launched a consultation on measures to tackle dangerous dogs and believe that to solve this problem we need to target their owners.
"Compulsory micro-chipping to help police and local authorities deal with problem dogs is one measure we are consulting on and in future it will be a criminal offence not to keep your dog under control on any private property.
"Once our consultation closes on June 15, we'll then carefully consider the responses before making a final announcement."