Transport for London had refused to carry the ad on the grounds that it was "likely to cause widespread or serious offence to members of the public", and it contained "images or messages which relate to matters of public controversy and sensitivity".
Today the judge backed the TfL stance, despite her finding that there had been unfairness in its procedures.
The judge said TfL had applied its advertising policy "inconsistently and partially", but its refusal to display the gay ad was "justified and proportionate, in furtherance of the legitimate aim of protecting the rights of others".
More top news
One of the teenagers was left so badly burnt doctors say he may lose his eyesight.
Jame Murray's challenge is to deliver Mr Khan's manifesto pledge to build more than 50,000 new homes a year - half of them affordable.
Ryan Lee was removed from the finishers' list because he was not picked up by the 5k checkpoint.