- 13 updates
The Government is claiming a High Court victory tonight over the high speed rail link - HS2 - and its legal fight with protesters. Andrew and Stacey link to our Transport Corespondent, Mike Pearse.
The High Court ruled that the consultation process for compensating those affected by the HS2 high-speed rail scheme "was so unfair as to be unlawful".
The decision was a victory for the High Speed 2 Action Alliance (HS2AA), which consists of more than 70 affiliated action groups and residents' associations.
The HS2AA case was one of five separate cases brought to block the rail scheme in its current form - it was the only case to succeed.
Mr Justice Ouseley, sitting at London's High Court, is now hearing submissions from lawyers on the appropriate remedy.
A lawyer from the firm who represented High Speed 2 Action Alliance (HS2AA) - who won a case against the government today - expressed delight over the victory on the compensation challenge.
Government consultations on compensating those affected by the proposed HS2 high-speed rail scheme were today ruled "unlawful" by the High Court, lawyers Leigh Day said.
Government says it will hold new consultation on HS2 property compensation following High Court ruling.
They say it will not delay the project and "it is full speed ahead. "
Mr Justice Ouseley said "The Secretary of State did not provide consultees with enough information about the property compensation scheme. "
The High Court is to rule today on legal challenges to the Government's HS2 high-speed rail scheme.
This report from January by Political Correspondent Carl Dinnen explains the route's location and why it is so controversial:
Rail Minister Simon Burns hailed the four out of five cases won at the High Court as a "landmark victory"and said the loss on the compensation case would "not affect the HS2 construction timetable in any way".
The Government has not acted unfairly in its consultation on HS2 says High Court.
It is not "irrational or unlawful" for the Government to want to promote the bill for the £32bn scheme.
The court is satisfied that while some individual people or groups may not have had opinions taken into account during the consultation the issues were taken into account.