'Plebgate' PC stands by account

Former Chief Whip Andrew Mitchell has accused the police officer at the centre of the 'plebgate' row in Downing Street of "not telling the truth". But PC Toby Rowland has stood by his account. Another police officer has been charged over the incident

Latest ITV News reports

Andrew Mitchell thanks those that 'stuck by him'

Andrew Mitchell MP, former Tory party whip, is speaking to reporters after one police officer was charged with misconduct in public office over the "plebgate" affair that forced him to resign from his job.

Andrew Mitchell, speaking to reporters, after charges were brought against PC Keith Wallis.
Andrew Mitchell, speaking to reporters, after charges were brought against PC Keith Wallis. Credit: ITV News

He said:

"I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my friends, my family, my many constituents in Sutton Coldfield, my staff, my legal team, political colleagues on both sides of the House of Commons and Lords, and members of the International Development Community.

"All who gave me their support and stuck by me throughout a very bleak period."

"I would also like to thank the journalists who refused to side with the mob, when I was caught between the press and police for 89 days."

Advertisement

CCTV footage of 'Plebgate' incident

CCTV footage of Andrew Mitchell leaving Downing Street was broadcast by Channel 4 News.

The CPS, who charged one officer with misconduct in a public office today, said they looked at "previously unseen and unedited CCTV" footage and concluded there was not enough evidence to "show that the officer at the (Downing Street) gate lied in his account".

PC Keith Wallis has been charged for allegedly sending an email to his MP but it is claimed he did not witness the exchange between Mr Mitchell and police officers at the gate.

Police Federation 'welcome' no charge for gate officer

We welcome the decision by the CPS that there was insufficient evidence to show that the officer at the gate lied in his account and that there was insufficient evidence to show that Mr Mitchell was the victim of a conspiracy of misinformation.

We have always been concerned by the selected information that has been put into the public domain and it is noteworthy that the CPS came to its conclusions after reviewing all the evidence, including unedited CCTV footage from Downing Street.

– Police Federation statement

Officer charged allegedly did not see 'Plebgate' incident

The police officer charged over the 'Plebgate' affair allegedly sent an email to his MP over the incident but it is claimed he did not witness the exchange between Andrew Mitchell and Downing Street officers, the Crown Prosecution Service said.

Andrew Mitchell was forced to resign over the claims he called officers "plebs". Credit: PA

A CPS statement said: "We have also received evidence in relation to PC Keith Wallis who sent an email to the deputy chief whip, John Randall who was his MP, saying that he had witnessed the incident.

"We have decided, having carefully considered the evidence in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors, that there is sufficient evidence to charge PC Wallis with misconduct in a public office and that it is in the public interest to do so.

"I should make it clear the misconduct allegation relates to evidence that PC Wallis falsely claimed to have witnessed the incident, not to how the incident was described in his account.

"PC Keith Wallis has been charged and is required to attend Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 16 December 2013."

CPS: 'Insufficient evidence to show officer at gate lied'

We have considered all of the evidence in this case, including previously unseen, unedited CCTV footage from Downing Street, not referred to by the media.

Taking it all into account, including the accounts of the officer at the gate of Downing Street and that of Andrew Mitchell MP before, during and after the incident, we have found that there is insufficient evidence to show that the officer at the gate lied in his account.

The CPS has also found that there is insufficient evidence to show that Mr Mitchell was the victim of a conspiracy of misinformation.

With insufficient evidence to show that the officer at the gate lied in his account, we must consider other matters, as set out below, on that basis.

I have, however, authorised one officer to be charged with one count of misconduct in public office.

– Alison Saunders, Director of Public Prosecutions

Advertisement

Load more updates