Naming and shaming doctors for missing cancer symptoms is "not going to make any real difference," one GP told ITV News.
Dr. Chaan Nagpul said: "We mustn't get into the situation where we are blaming doctors for presentations that are difficult to diagnose."
He added: "If cancer was a simple condition to diagnose at an early stage it wouldn't be a killer disease. It's a killer disease because it does actually deceive the patient and deceive the doctor."
Were doctors names and would be worried that the system would quickly become clogged up as doctors began referring everyone who had the faintest possibility of cancer to hospital, he said.
He added: "It may reduce access for those patients to specialists to those patients who do have cancer."
The Government's plan of "naming and shaming" doctors who repeatedly fail to spot signs of cancer is "a desperate idea", Labour's shadow health minister said.
This is a desperate idea from a Government that won't take responsibility for the problems it has created in the NHS.
David Cameron wasted billions on a re-organisation nobody wanted and left cancer patients waiting longer for tests and treatment. He should be ashamed of his own record - not attacking doctors.
This Government has thrown away progress made on cancer care. It is proof of why the Tories can't be trusted with the NHS.
GPs who repeatedly fail to spot cancer signs in their patients will be named and shamed on an NHS website.
Doctors will be marked with a red flag if they are deemed to be missing too many cases or patients have to make repeated visits before being sent for tests, according to the Mail on Sunday.
Luke O’Reilly, whose mother Diane Howell had to see a GP 15 times before being referred for tests, told the paper: "Rating family doctors on cancer is essential. My mum was made to feel she was wasting the doctors’ time when she was actually very ill."
Britain has worse cancer survival rates than other European countries, mainly due to late diagnosis.
"We know that 40 per cent of patients with pancreatic cancer have visit their GP four times or more before being referred. A tenth have to see them ten times or more," Ali Stunt, founder of Pancreatic Cancer Action, told the paper.
GPs face being named and shamed if they repeatedly fail to spot signs of cancer in their patients, it has been reported.
Doctors will be marked out with a red flag on an NHS website if they are deemed to be missing too many cases or patients have to make repeated visits before being referred for tests, according to the Mail on Sunday.
Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said tough action must be taken to bring standards at practices with poor cancer referral rates into line with those who have the highest standards.
He told the newspaper: "Cancer diagnosis levels around the country vary significantly and we must do much more to improve both the level of diagnosis and to bring those GP practices with poor referral rates up to the standards of the best."
Mammograms are "still the best method" modern medicine has for early detection of breast cancer and giving patients the best chance of beating it, a health expert told Good Morning Britain.
Dr Sarah Rawlings from Breakthrough Breast Cancer urged women to continue to have regular checks, despite research suggesting mammograms only prevent one death in every 368 patients who are screened.
Rearchers analysed more than 15 million "person years" and observed breast cancer deaths among 1,175 of the women who were diagnosed after receiving an invitation to screening and in 8,996 of the women who were not invited.
After adjusting for various factors they estimated that invitation to mammography screening was associated with a 28% reduced risk of death from breast cancer.
Baroness Delyth Morgan, boss of the charity Breast Cancer Campaign, said: "This study adds to existing evidence that confirms that breast screening saves lives. Diagnosing breast cancer quickly is vital, as the earlier breast cancer is diagnosed and treated, the greater the chances of survival."
"Women invited to screening in the Norwegian mammography screening programme were at a 28% lower risk of death from breast cancer than women who had not (yet) been invited," the authors wrote.
New research suggests breast cancer screening reduces the number of deaths from the disease by 28%. For every 368 women who are invited to have a mammogram, one death is prevented, the study claims.
The researchers from Norway set out to evaluate the effectiveness of modern mammography screening by comparing the effects on breast cancer mortality among screened and unscreened women.
The study, published on bmj.com, analysed data from all women in Norway aged 50 to 79 between 1986 and 2009 - the period in which the mammography screening programme was gradually rolled out across the country.
Claims by Macmillan Cancer Support that delayed assessments for a disability benefit have left at least 4,500 cancer patients waiting six months or more have been questioned by welfare officials.
The Department for Work and Pensions said the charity's survey results are "at best to be treated with extreme caution" because it involved only 210 patients.
Official statistics on waiting times are still being compiled.
Macmillan's report is based on a very small sample size using simplistic calculations to produce results, which at best should be treated with extreme caution.
Claims for terminally ill people are fast-tracked using 'special rules' under Personal Independence Payment and statistics show over 99% of people with terminal illnesses who have applied have been awarded the benefit. That means over 10,000 terminally ill claimants are now receiving PIP.
We have been working with Macmillan and they have acknowledged that improvements to the system have already been made.
PIP replaces the outdated Disability Living Allowance which was introduced over 20 years ago.
It includes a new face-to-face assessment and regular reviews - something missing from the old system - to make sure support is better targeted at those who need it most.
Almost half of cancer patients are unhappy with the process of obtaining the new Personal Independence Payment benefit.
Macmillan Cancer Support said their survey showed 47% of patients were dissatisfied with the process - a third because of the delays and almost a quarter (23%) because of "poor communication from the Department for Work and Pensions.
Macmillan's head of policy Duleep Allirajah said: "Our report shows the real and shattering impact of these PIP delays are having on cancer patients.
"It is unacceptable that people struggle to heat their homes, are saddled with debt or are left anxious or depressed because they are waiting so long for their much-needed benefits."
Benefits delays are leaving thousands of cancer patients forced to wait months to find out if they will receive help, a charity has found.
A survey from Macmillan Cancer Support found 4,500 cancer patients had been made to wait six months or more for a decision on whether they will get the new Personal Independence Payment (PIP).
The charity said the poll had shown the "shattering" impact of the problems with the introduction of PIP, which has replaced Disability Living Allowance.