The Home Secretary has confirmed that she has signed a "comprehensive mutual legal assistance" agreement with Jordan which could aid efforts to deport radical cleric Abu Qatada.
Theresa May said the agreement is "fully reciprocal and offers considerable advantages to both countries, and reflects our joint commitment to tacking international crime".
"I believe that the treaty we have agreed with Jordan - once ratified by both parliaments - will finally make possible the deportation of Abu Qatada.
"But as I have warned the House before, even when the treaty is fully ratified, it will not mean that Qatada will be on a plane to Jordan within days".
The Home Secretary Theresa May has made a statement on efforts to deport the radical cleric Abu Qatada.
She said the government will seek permission to appeal to the Supreme Court after the Court of Appeal rejected the Government's request to go the court in its fight to extradite Qatada.
Home Secretary confirms government will seek Supreme Court appeal over Abu Qatada deportation #Qatada
The Home Secretary, Theresa May will make a statement to the Commons today, after the Court of Appeal rejected the Government's request to go the Supreme Court in its fight to extradite radical cleric Abu Qatada.
The Government could still ask to appeal to the Supreme Court directly, but the request is less likely to be successful than if it had the backing of the Court of Appeal. No other legal options remain if the Supreme Court decide not to hear the case.
The Government has been refused permission to take its fight to remove preacher Abu Qatada from the UK to the Supreme Court.Read the full story ›
The Government has been refused permission to take to the Supreme Court its fight to remove preacher Abu Qatada from the UK.
Home Secretary Theresa May will make a statement in Parliament tomorrow.
ITV News UK Editor Lucy Manning reports:
London Mayor Boris Johnson has joined those who have expressed disappointment over the latest setback in attempts to deport Abu Qatada.
He said: "This decision is disappointing and perplexing and unfair on London taxpayers, who are footing the bill.
"Abu Qatada’s deportation is long overdue.
“The Home Office decision to appeal directly to the Supreme Court is welcome but must happen alongside expedited discussions between the Government and the Jordanians to ensure he receives a fair trial."
Conservative MP Mark Reckless has criticised Theresa May’s legal strategy over the attempted deportation of Abu Qatada – but added that she has one more chance to succeed.
He said: “The Home Secretary has pursued throughout the wrong legal strategy, she’s got one last chance and what she needs to do is to put the key constitutional questions to the Supreme Court – who has the last word, Strasbourg or the Supreme Court?
"If she does that, I think she can still win.”
The Court of Appeal turned down May’s attempt to take to the Supreme Court her fight to have Qatada deported and she will now appeal directly to the highest court in the country.
Reckless added: “There is a real chance but she needs a proper point of law to argue…
“She needs to make this big constitutional argument because we can win that.”
Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has criticised Theresa May's efforts to deport Abu Qatada, saying her strategy has "completely failed".
She said: “A year ago Theresa May promised Abu Qatada would soon be on a plane. Now it is clear her legal strategy has completely failed...
“Theresa May failed to appeal against the European Court decision last year. It is no good the Home Secretary blaming the Court when she didn't appeal when she had the chance."
The Government has been refused permission to take its fight to remove preacher Abu Qatada from the UK to the Supreme Court, but the affair is not at an end.
The Home Office will now request permission to appeal directly to the Supreme Court.
Three Supreme Court justices are expected to consider that appeal, which is set to be presented on paper rather than in the form of a full hearing.
The decision could be overturned if the justices are convinced there is a "point of law of general public importance".