Live updates

Study 'shows low risk of IVF'

Dr Allan Pacey, senior lecturer in reproductive and developmental medicine at the University of Sheffield and chairman of the British Fertility Society, said those embarking on IVF should feel reassured by the reports findings, he said:

This is a very important study which defines the risks of IVF children being born with two neurodevelopmental disorders. It is a large study and is exactly the kind we need if we are to give patients accurate information before they embark on treatment.

The main message of the paper is a positive one, suggesting that any risk of these disorders is very low, or absent, in comparison to children conceived naturally. However it does highlight the importance of preferentially using standard IVF rather than Icsi, and also using ejaculated sperm rather than those recovered surgically from the testicle, in situations where it is possible to do so.

Patients about to embark on treatment should not worry and should discuss any concerns about their treatment plan with the team responsible for their care.

IVF findings 'should not stop parents using fertility treatments'

Study leader Dr Avi Reichenberg, from the Institute of Psychiatry at King's College London, said:

Our study shows that treatments developed to manage male infertility are associated with an increased risk for developmental disorders in offspring.

The exact mechanism is unclear, but there are a number of risk factors, from selection of IVF procedures, to multiple embryos, and to pre-term birth.

Whilst intellectual disability or autism remain a rare outcome for IVF, being aware of the increased risk associated with specific types of IVF means offspring at risk can be identified and potentially monitored for developmental disorders, ensuring they receive early detection and appropriate support and care.

The researchers insisted the research should not hinder childless couples seeking IVF treatment.Co-author Dr Karl-Gosta Nygren, from the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, said:

There's no question that we would stop any treatment or anything like that because of the findings. On the contrary, the results are reassuring.

It's important to remember that the majority of children are born perfectly healthily following IVF.

Our study provides much-needed information for parents and clinicians on the relative risks of modern IVF treatments, enabling them to make the most informed choice possible.

Advertisement

Common IVF technique can affect child's IQ

Compared with 'natural' conception, IVF overall had no effect on autism rates and led to a very small 18% increased risk of low IQ which appeared to be linked to multiple births.

Icsi used with fresh or frozen embryos produced 51% more intellectually impaired children than standard IVF. Credit: Ben Birchall/PA Wire

The significant findings only emerged when researchers compared six different types of IVF involving the standard "mixing-in-a-dish" method of fertilising eggs or Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (Icsi).

Icsi used with fresh or frozen embryos produced 51% more intellectually impaired children than standard IVF.

The direct injection method, Icsi, was originally developed to help infertile men, but it now makes up half of IVF treatments in the UK including those resulting from female fertility problems.

'Increased risk of low intelligence' in IVF children

Certain forms of IVF treatment are significantly associated with an increased risk of low intelligence in children, a major study has shown.

A link was also found with an especially severe type of autism, but only in the case of twins or triplets.

'Increased risk of low intelligence' in IVF children Credit: Ben Birchall/PA Wire

Scientists who analysed data on more than 2.5 million births stressed that the chances of an IVF baby being affected remained tiny in real terms.

The Swedish study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, is the first of its kind to compare a wide range of IVF treatments.

New IVF technique 'a step towards designer babies '

Paul Tully from the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children said the "three parent" IVF technique is a "step" towards designer babies.

Mr Tully told ITV News: "It is a change that can be passed on to future generations, and we are manipulating the genes of a child.

Paul Tully from the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children. Credit: ITV News

"We're concerned that we are replacing what we know to be defective DNA in the embryos that we don't like with what we think is good DNA - but we can't be sure.

"Putting the money into this kind of research is denying funding to research which is needed and ongoing to help people with mitochondrial diseases and other diseases in other ways.

"We've seen the same thing before with stem cell research, we've seen it with IVF - promises that using embryos will lead to advances but come to nothing.

Advertisement

Genetic Alliance UK welcomes new IVF technique

Genetic Alliance UK has welcomed the "three parent" IVF technique proposal.

The charity's director, Alastair Kent, said: "Many of these [mitochondrial] conditions are so severe that they are lethal in infancy, creating a lasting impact upon the child's family.

An embryo being frozen with the new vitrification process into a long term storage chamber. Credit: Ben Birchall/PA Wire

"An added option for families at risk of having a child with such a condition is welcome".

Experts said the technique would likely be used in around a dozen IVF cases every year.

Campaign group: IVF technique 'ethically unsound'

The director of the Human Genetics Alert campaign group said the IVF technique used to create babies with three genetic parents is "unnecessary" and "ethically unsound".

A three-day-old human embryo. Credit: PA Wire

Dr David King also criticised the Government for failing to conduct a more comprehensive public consultation on the issue.

Dr King told Reuters, "They cross the ethical line that has been agreed by Governments around the world that we should not genetically alter human beings".

Plans for three parent babies 'unnecessary and unsafe'

Some groups say the proposals for three parent babies are causing worldwide concern:

These techniques are unnecessary and unsafe and were in fact rejected by the majority of consultation responses.

It is a disaster that the decision to cross the line that will eventually lead to a eugenic designer baby market should be taken on the basis of an utterly biased and inadequate consultation.

Such a decision of major historical significance requires a much more extensive public debate with a much clearer outcome.

We therefore call upon the Secretary of State for Health not to legalise the techniques until a major national debate has taken place and the outcome is much clearer.

– Josephine Quintavalle, from the group Comment on Reproductive Ethics
Load more updates