Sir Brian Leveson is a judge but I bet he never thought that press regulation would end up back in court. As far as the Government is concerned it is not going to delay the regulation of the press. They say they have not received legal documents from the newspapers yet.
The plan is that the Privy Council will meet next week and consider the politician's plan, and probably accept it. If a Judicial Review does go ahead it is likely that it will delay things and the view from the Government is that would be very disappointing.
- The contract which will bind publishers to IPSO and give the regulator tough powers of investigation, enforcement and sanction.
- Regulations under which it will operate, investigate complaints and undertake standards investigations.
- Details which set out the governance of the regulator and guarantee its independence.
- Financial sanctions guidance under which fines of up to £1 million will be imposed.
- Details of a new Regulatory Funding Company setting out transparently how IPSO will be funded.
The decision by the Government and the Privy Council on this matter has enormous ramifications for free speech both here in the UK, and – because of our leadership role in the Commonwealth and developing world – across the globe.
The Government and the Privy Council should have applied the most rigorous standards of consultation and examination of the Royal Charter proposed by the industry, which would have enshrined tough regulatory standards at the same time as protecting press freedom. They singularly failed to do so, and that is why – as the issues at stake are so extraordinarily high - we are having to take this course of action.
The newspaper and magazine industry has applied to the High Court for a judicial review of the Privy Council's decision to reject its self-regulation proposals for a Royal Charter.
A statement said "it is the clear view" of the industry’s trade associations that the application "was not dealt with fairly".
"We believe that the decision and the Order were therefore unlawful, and the industry’s associations through PressBof [ the industry body which funds the regulatory system] are applying to the High Court for judicial review and to have the decision quashed".
Newspapers and magazines have begun to set up a new press watchdog in the wake of the phone hacking scandal - but have been instantly criticised by campaigners.
Plans for the Independent Press Standards Organisation, which will have the power to impose fines of up to £1m, will go out to consultation.
But Hacked Off, which represents some of the victims of phone hacking, claimed the move was a "cynical rebranding exercise" that showed the industry was "determined to hold on to the power to bully the public without facing any consequences".
New figures released Labour reveal that only 7% of the total TV workforce (on and off-screen) are women over the age of 50.
Meanwhile, the majority of TV presenters who are over 50 are men (82%).
Miriam O'Reilly, who won an employment tribunal against the BBC on the grounds of ageism, said:
These figures raise the obvious questions of where have all the older women gone and why did they go? Was it their choice to leave their jobs or was it a decision forced upon them?
The broadcasters say they are committed to the fair representation of older women, but the figures don't bear that out.
I'd like to know the reasons why so many talented women have disappeared, while their male counterparts have grown older and still have their jobs.
Women on television are affected by a "combination of ageism and sexism" that does not apply to men, according to new figures released by Labour.
Harriet Harman, shadow secretary of state for culture, media and sport, asked the six main UK broadcasters how many older women they employ on screen and behind the camera.
The findings were that while the majority of over 50s in the UK are women (53.1%), the overwhelming majority of TV presenters who are over 50 are men (82%).
It was discovered that only 7% of the total TV workforce (on and off-screen) are women over the age of 50.
Ms Harman said: "The figures provided by broadcasters show clearly that once female presenters hit 50, their days on-screen are numbered.
"It is an encouraging first step that broadcasters have been open in providing these statistics. Their response shows that they all recognise that this is an important issue that needs to be addressed.
"I will be publishing these figures annually so we are able to monitor progress."
Ms Harman will also be holding a roundtable with broadcasters in the House of Commons today to challenge them to take action.
The BBC is to remove gagging clauses from its contracts in the wake of the Savile scandal to make it easier for staff to speak out about any claims of harassment.
A major report into sexism and bullying at the corporation has found that some staff are scared of making complaints about inappropriate behaviour.
But the 80-page report by barrister Dinah Rose said that although sexual harassment was found to be "very rare", there was some evidence of inappropriate behaviour and bullying.