Standards at schools could "go into reverse" unless improvements are made, the head of Ofsted has warned.
Sir Michael Wilshaw said the rate of improvement in many schools is "grinding to a halt", with 170,000 students still at schools rated inadequate - an increase of 70,000 from 2012.
Education Secretary Nicky Morgan said the results of Wilshaw's third annual report was down to a tougher inspection regime.
ITV News Political Correspondent Libby Wiener reports:
Thirteen areas across England have been named and shamed in a new Ofsted report for having the lowest number of students at 'good' or 'outstanding' secondary schools.
In the 13 local authority areas, children have a less than 50 per cent chance of attending one of the better secondaries - meaning more than half end up in schools which need improvement or which have been branded 'inadequate'.
These areas are:
- Tameside: 49% (up 3 points from last year)
- Middlesbrough: 48% (up 6pts)
- Barnsley: 48% (up 25pts)
- East Riding of Yorkshire: 46% (up 8pts)
- Stockton-on-Tees: 46% (down 16pts)
- Derbyshire: 42% (down 13pts)
- Bradford: 40% (down 8pts)
- Blackpool: 38% (down 8pts)
- Doncaster: 37% (down 6pts)
- Oldham: 36% (down 21pts)
- St Helens: 35% (down 12pts)
- Hartlepool: 35% (no change)
- Isle of Wight: 17% (up 3pts)
The report found that only six areas in the country could boast 100 per cent of secondary-age students attending the top schools, five of which are in London - Haringey, Hounslow, Islington, Kensington and Chelsea, and Westminster - along with Rutland in the East Midlands.
Poor behaviour from pupils is blighting the UK's secondary schools, Ofsted's chief inspector has warned - with almost half a million children sharing lessons with misbehaving classmates.
Sir Michael Wilshaw said too many secondaries were dealing with a "hubbub" of gossip, shouting out, using their phones and other disruptions which often made teaching almost impossible.
He found that of those schools inspected in the 2013/14 academic year, there was a seven per cent drop in the number where pupil behaviour was classed as 'good' or 'outstanding'.
This is unacceptable... Inspectors found far too many instances of pupils gossiping, calling out without permission, using their mobiles, being slow to start work or follow instructions, or failing to bring the right books or equipment to class.
While these are minor infractions in themselves, cumulatively they create a hubbub of interference that makes teaching and learning difficult and sometimes impossible.
His latest report adds that schools were often failing to challenge their brightest pupils, with a "worrying lack of scholarship" and teachers' expectations "too low" to match their students' abilities.
The Department for Education has defended standards at secondary schools across the country, saying there had been "incredible improvements" over the past few years.
It comes after Ofsted chief Sir Michael Wilshaw criticised performance as "not good enough".
In a report released today, Sir Michael said the proportion of secondaries rated as 'inadequate' had risen dramatically over the past 12 months.
But a DfE spokesman said Ofsted's tougher new inspections were behind the figures, as they left substandard schools with 'nowhere to hide'.
We share Sir Michael Wilshaw's ambition to keep raising standards in secondary schools but we should acknowledge we have seen incredible improvements in recent years - all achieved against the backdrop of Ofsted's much tougher inspection framework which leaves no room for underperforming schools to hide.
They added that around one million more children were being taught in good or outstanding schools since 2010.
Chief Inspector at Ofsted Sir Michael Wilshaw has said that secondary schools need to improve to match the increase in the number of primary schools now judged as 'good.'
There is a growing difference in performance between primary schools and secondary schools...a third of secondary schools are not yet judged as good - and that's just not good enough and they've got to improve to catch the rate of increase in the primary sector.
In total, there are now around 170,000 pupils at secondary schools rated inadequate - the lowest Ofsted rating available. This is up by 70,000 children compared to two years ago.
The report also reveals wide differences across the country in pupils' chances of attending a decent secondary school.
In about a third of local authority areas, less than 70% of state secondary schools are considered to be good or better, while in 13 areas, children have a less than 50% chance of being educated at a good or outstanding secondary.
Tens of thousands more teenagers are now attending failing state secondary schools, the head of Ofsted is warning, raising concerns standards are stagnating.
The proportion of secondaries rated as inadequate has risen in the last 12 months, with over 50 more schools now in special measures than there were a year ago, according to the Sir Michael Wilshaw.
In his third annual report, published today, Sir Michael says while primary schools in England continue to forge ahead, the rate of improvement in secondary education is grinding to a halt, with the overall proportion rated good or outstanding remaining the same as last year.
What happened in Rotherham could "could happen anywhere", a victim of abuse in the town told ITV News.
The girl, one of an estimated 1,400 child sex victims in the area, said: "It can happen to anyone. It's not just a problem in Rotherham. It's a problem all over the country.
"What officials need to do is acknowledge that it's a problem and show that they are going to tackle it. Not just say yes, we know it's a problem, but to start and prove to people that they are going to challenge it."
Rotherham's new director of children's services Jane Parfrement said any council worker not up to the job faces the sack.
An Ofsted report into child sexual exploitation identified seven other problem areas in the England where services need to be improved.
It said Brent, Bristol, Camden, Kent, Luton, Oldham and Rochdale, are "not responding to child sexual exploitation consistently or well" and leaving children "exposed to risk of harm".
Ofsted has said scandal-hit services are still guilty of "widespread failures" that result in children "being harmed or at risk of harm".Read the full story ›
Ofsted's national director for social care has said it not enough to 'simply wait for the next scandal to happen' in a damning report on councils' response to child sexual exploitation.
While we have found examples of excellent frontline practice, it is clear that some areas have moved faster, further and more effectively than others.
It is not enough to simply wait for the next scandal to happen. We are calling on all local authorities and their partners to ensure that they have a comprehensive multi-agency strategy and action plan in place to tackle child sexual exploitation.