Live updates

May's data law plans branded 'incredibly dangerous'

Lib Dem home affairs spokesman Julian Huppert has issued a big warning over the breadth of the Home Office's plans for new data laws, dubbed by critics as a 'snooping bill'.

Mr Huppert said many people would be "uncomfortable" if websites they visit, such as for abortion providers or marriage counsellors, would be logged under new laws.

He also expressed concerns that the location a text was sent from could be stored, as he dismissed Theresa May's support for the bill.

This is the sort of rhetoric that we were used to hearing from home secretaries from the last government arguing for 90-day detention without charge. ... It is very, very dangerous once you start collecting huge amounts of data on literally everybody on the country... that is incredibly dangerous.

– Julian Huppert, Speaking on BBC Breakfast


Home Office: 'Can be no delay to this legislation'

This legislation is vital to help catch paedophiles, terrorists and other serious criminals and we are pleased both scrutiny committees have recognised the need for new laws.

We have now considered the committees' recommendations carefully and we will accept the substance of them all. But there can be no delay to this legislation. It is needed by law enforcement agencies now.

– Home Office spokesperson

Clegg: Balance between security and liberty needed

Nick Clegg acknowledged that new powers were needed by the law enforcement agencies to fight crime, but said they must take account of the committee's concerns.

That must be done in a proportionate way that gets the balance between security and liberty right.

Any modernisation of the powers, including possible new legislation, must meet the concerns of the joint committee by having the best possible safeguards and keeping costs under control.

Scope of draft Communications Bill 'too wide'

The committee said under the draft Bill, the Home Secretary would be given "sweeping powers to issue secret notices" ordering communications companies to disclose "potentially limitless categories of data".

Ministers argue that proposal, known as clause one, has been kept deliberately wide so it can be "future-proofed".

But the committee dismissed the argument and criticised the Government for failing to properly take account of the right to privacy.

There is a fine but crucial line between allowing our law enforcement and security agencies' access to the information they need to protect the country, and allowing our citizens to go about their daily business without a fear, however unjustified, that the state is monitoring their every move.

Whilst the joint committee realise that there are specific data types which are not currently available, and which would aid the work of law enforcement bodies and the security services, we are very concerned at how wide the scope of the Bill is in its current form.

– Committee chairman Lord Blencathra

Clegg urges rethink of data laws

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg. Credit: PA Wire

Government plans to give the police and security services new powers to monitor all emails, web visits and phone calls must undergo a "fundamental rethink", Nick Clegg has warned.

The Deputy Prime Minister said ministers needed to "go back to the drawing board" after a committee of MPs and peers found measures supposed to enable investigators to keep pace with technological developments went far further than necessary and amounted to overkill.

The committee, set up to examine the draft Communications Bill, accused the Government of using "fanciful and misleading" figures to support its case for the legislation.

Mr Clegg said ministers must take account of the committee's findings and that the Bill - dubbed a "snooper's charter" by critics - could not proceed in its current form.


Load more updates