The archbishop called zero-hours contracts ‘the reincarnation of an ancient evil’.Read the full story ›
The number of workers on zero hours contracts has increased by a fifth over the past year, official figures show.
Just over 900,000 people are now employed on the controversial contracts, compared to 747,000 a year ago.
Women make up 55% of those on zero hour contracts, while one in five employed on them is in full-time education.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said that these figures show that almost three per cent of the UK workforce is on a zero hours contract.
New TUC analysis has shown that someone employed on a zero hours contract earns on average 50% less than the typical employee. The median hourly wage for zero hours workers is £7.25, while it is £11.05 for others.
TUC general secretary Frances O'Grady slammed the findings: "It is very easy for politicians and employers to talk about the 'flexibility' these contracts offer, but they are not the ones living at the sharp end of the labour market.
"If you don't know how much work you will have from one day to the next, paying the bills and arranging things like childcare can be a nightmare."
A spokesperson for the Business Department hit back, saying: "Since May last year, the use of exclusivity clauses has been unlawful, meaning that individuals have more control over their lives and can work more hours with another employer if they wish.
"Fewer than 3% of the UK workforce classes itself as being on a zero-hours contract in their main job, with almost 70% of those on this type of contract happy with the number of hours they work."
The contracts - which leave workers unsure of how many hours they will work each week - have been under the spotlight in recent days after Sports Direct said it would change arrangements for some staff.
Vince Cable has said clauses in zero-hour contracts that ban workers from jobs with other employers are "offensive".
Dr Cable told Radio 4's Today programme: "What happens is that people turn up for work under a zero-hours contracts, they’re not guaranteed any work, but they’re banned from working for other people...I think it’s that aspect of it that was offensive and constituted an abuse that we want to stop."
The Business Secretary is bringing forward plans to outlaw these 'exclusivity clauses', although he has said that the broader idea of zero-hours contracts can be "perfectly sensible" for some workers.
Britain's biggest trade union has criticised the Government's decision to only ban exclusivity clauses in zero-hours contracts.
General Secretary Dave Prentis said zero-hours workers were unable to secure credit, loans, or mortgages because of the uncertainty created by the employment tactic.
Banning exclusivity clauses misses the bigger picture for workers on zero hours contracts.
They leave workers not knowing day to day, week to week, what work they will get and what money they will have coming in.
It makes planning impossible and leaves workers unable to get credit, loans, mortgages or rental agreements. The uncertainty damages their family life and health and well-being.
Tying workers to one business when they are employed on a zero-hour contract is "rigid and archaic", according to a business chief.
Director general of the Institute of Directors (IoD), Simon Walker, came out in support of Vince Cable's move to ban the use of exclusivity clause but allow businesses to continue to use zero-hours contracts.
The IoD has long campaigned against the exploitation of employees on zero hours contracts. Tying an employee into an exclusivity cause can turn a flexible contract into a rigid and archaic one.
The whole point about the flexibility offered by zero hours contracts is that they allow an individual to capitalise on their own time, labour and energy.
We're pleased that the Government recognises the enormous value that flexible contracts can bring to both employer and employee, but at the same time it's right to ensure that exploitation is stamped out.
The Business Secretary has hit out at "unscrupulous employers" who abuse the exclusivity clause in zero-hour contracts, tying workers to one company.
Vince Cable announced a clampdown on employers who take on staff with no promise of hours or benefits, and insist they work for no one else.
Despite calls from unions to ban zero-hours contracts outright, Mr Cable said the controversial practice had a place in the labour market - offering working opportunities especially for students and older people.
However, an estimated 125,000 zero-hours workers will benefit from the exclusivity clause ban as they can now look for additional work without fear of losing their current employment, the Business Department said.
A recent report by the Office for National Statistics estimated that employers held 1.4 million contracts that did not guarantee a minimum number of hours.
Protests originating in the US have found support in London and around the globe as employees push for a bigger slice of profits.Read the full story ›
Lack of clear information and exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts can leave employees "feeling vulnerable", the Business Secretary has said.
Vince Cable said Acas' research supported what the Government had found in their review of zero hours contracts:
Whilst zero hours contracts work for some, the use of exclusivity clauses and the lack of clear information can leave employees feeling vulnerable.
That is why I launched a consultation last autumn which looked into the issues of transparency and exclusivity in the use of zero hours contracts, to ensure people are getting a fair deal.
I want to make sure those looking to work flexibly under these types of contracts understand their rights and are not prevented from topping up their income by being tied exclusively to one employer. We will publish our response to the consultation shortly.
Many workers "did not seem to even know" they were employed on zero hours contract, with some believing they were permanent staff because of their length of service, a study has shown.
Data from conciliation service Acas showed workers on zero hours often experienced deep seeded insecurities about their long-term employment prospects.
Acas chairman Sir Brendan Barber, said:
A lot of workers on zero hours contracts are afraid of looking for work elsewhere, turning down hours, or questioning their employment rights in case their work is withdrawn or reduced.
This deep rooted "effective exclusivity" can be very damaging to trust and to the employment relationship.
There also appeared to be a lack of transparency on the terms of their contractual arrangements.
Many people did not seem to even know that they were on a zero hours contracts and some believed they were on a permanent contract due to the length of their service.