It was important that the High Court deliver a judgment on this matter so that both the public and those working in the criminal justice system could be certain of the law regarding the sending of menacing messages. We respect the court’s decision and will not be appealing.
Following our decision to charge Mr Chambers, both the magistrates’ court and the Crown Court, in upholding his conviction, agreed that his message had the potential to cause real concern to members of the public, such as those travelling through the airport during the relevant time. Presenting our case allowed the High Court to hear both sides and reach a fully considered decision. We have noted and accepted the court’s reasoning.
More top news
This is the sight that greeted one environmental conservationist - a deer with its head stuck in a light globe.
A serial killer dubbed the "Grim Sleeper" could face the death penalty after being convicted of murdering nine women and a teenage girl.
Britons must have e-passports to visit America or risk being turned away, travellers have been warned.