It was important that the High Court deliver a judgment on this matter so that both the public and those working in the criminal justice system could be certain of the law regarding the sending of menacing messages. We respect the court’s decision and will not be appealing.
Following our decision to charge Mr Chambers, both the magistrates’ court and the Crown Court, in upholding his conviction, agreed that his message had the potential to cause real concern to members of the public, such as those travelling through the airport during the relevant time. Presenting our case allowed the High Court to hear both sides and reach a fully considered decision. We have noted and accepted the court’s reasoning.
More top news
A 42-year-old woman has been held after at least six people were injured in a collision with a car outside a sports centre in Newcastle.
The Brexit Secretary's comments come after Chancellor Philip Hammond's remarks that no EU deal would "very, very bad" for the UK.
The young royal says he was reluctant to take on the responsibilities of his title, but loyalty to the Queen helped him "work out a role".