It was important that the High Court deliver a judgment on this matter so that both the public and those working in the criminal justice system could be certain of the law regarding the sending of menacing messages. We respect the court’s decision and will not be appealing.
Following our decision to charge Mr Chambers, both the magistrates’ court and the Crown Court, in upholding his conviction, agreed that his message had the potential to cause real concern to members of the public, such as those travelling through the airport during the relevant time. Presenting our case allowed the High Court to hear both sides and reach a fully considered decision. We have noted and accepted the court’s reasoning.
More top news
The superhero appeared to join pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong which have been going on for over a month.
MPs and academics claim the extra light in the evenings would save lives on the roads and benefit public health.
Students at Marysville-Pilchuck High School in Washington are overcome with emotion at hearing their classmate was shot dead.