It was important that the High Court deliver a judgment on this matter so that both the public and those working in the criminal justice system could be certain of the law regarding the sending of menacing messages. We respect the court’s decision and will not be appealing.
Following our decision to charge Mr Chambers, both the magistrates’ court and the Crown Court, in upholding his conviction, agreed that his message had the potential to cause real concern to members of the public, such as those travelling through the airport during the relevant time. Presenting our case allowed the High Court to hear both sides and reach a fully considered decision. We have noted and accepted the court’s reasoning.
More top news
Charities could face criminal sanctions for bullying the public into giving money, their regulator has warned.
A 'fat tax' could be imposed on the cremation of bodies in Liverpool that require a coffin 30 inches wide or more.
Controversial columnist Katie Hopkins has described her fear that she may die during brain surgery to cure her epilepsy.