Mr Justice Foskett, sitting at the High Court in London today, said that "characterising such a scheme as involving or being analogous to 'slavery' or 'forced labour' seems to me to be a long way from contemporary thinking".
He said that both of the claimants were entitled to a declaration that there had been breaches of the 2011 jobseeker's allowance regulations in their cases.
But he ruled that the mistakes did not invalidate the 2011 jobseeker's allowance regulations, nor did they breach human rights laws banning slavery.
More top news
Rights groups believe the vote reflects international disapproval of Moscow's involvement in the war in Syria.
The reopening of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's e-mails came as a shock, writes Robert Moore - could it cost her the presidency?
A quiet and calm end to month and staying frost free tonight.