Mr Justice Foskett, sitting at the High Court in London today, said that "characterising such a scheme as involving or being analogous to 'slavery' or 'forced labour' seems to me to be a long way from contemporary thinking".
He said that both of the claimants were entitled to a declaration that there had been breaches of the 2011 jobseeker's allowance regulations in their cases.
But he ruled that the mistakes did not invalidate the 2011 jobseeker's allowance regulations, nor did they breach human rights laws banning slavery.
More top news
Concerns about the way Google and other multinationals pay tax have been around for at least three years.
BT is launching a "breakthrough" new service aimed at completely eradicating millions of nuisance calls for its customers.
Wintry weather into the weekend