On the ITV News Facebook page we have been asking what you think about the use of 'gene selection' to prevent children being born with inherited diseases. Is it a positive medical development or is it going too far? Here are some of your views:
I've got a son, conceived naturally, and very much wanted. However, he has a number of serious health problems that are more prevalent in boys. I'm too scared to risk another, because his life is HARD. I'd like to be guaranteed a girl in the hopes of reducing the chances of having another child whose life is a constant struggle and heartache
Wrong. Somethings you just dont mess with and human life is one, we are to be what we are, picking and choosing the way a life will or won't be is so so wrong.
There are many reasons for which this should be used. Where the child will live a very unhappy and painful life and be unable to enjoy life. It should not be used for making the child beautiful ie blonde hair blue eye etc... Medical issues only
More top news
Labour's billboard posters during the general election campaign will focus on 'issues not personalities', the party's strategist has said.
Scientists find a cluster of spinal neurons integrate sensory data and unconsciously adjust muscles to maintain balance and avoid slipping.
Billionaire businessman Stefano Pessina has said the Labour leader's economic plans are "not helpful for business or the country."