Sean Doyle, the former principal scientist at the Government's Forensic Explosives Laboratory, has come forward to claim flaws in the evidence used to convict the failed 21/7 bombers.
He also cast doubt over the work of the prosecution's expert witness, Dr Stuart Black, at the 2007 trial.
In his witness statement, which forms a key part of their appeal, Mr Doyle sets out his "concerns regarding some of the scientific evidence presented by the prosecution".
Tests shown at the trial led to the conclusion that the four men's homemade devices were "potentially viable," despite failing to explode on the day.
The men claimed their targeted attacks on three tube trains and a bus were a hoax.
More top news
A group of friends in Haverhill have left one of their mates with a fractured spine after a prank with a home-made ejector seat went wrong
Temperatures will remain low for most of the country as Britain battles against wintry showers, snow and gales this afternoon.
A giant panda has been caught in camera breaking iron bars and moving into the other cell to have a taste of milk in the next cell.