Sean Doyle, the former principal scientist at the Government's Forensic Explosives Laboratory, has come forward to claim flaws in the evidence used to convict the failed 21/7 bombers.
He also cast doubt over the work of the prosecution's expert witness, Dr Stuart Black, at the 2007 trial.
In his witness statement, which forms a key part of their appeal, Mr Doyle sets out his "concerns regarding some of the scientific evidence presented by the prosecution".
Tests shown at the trial led to the conclusion that the four men's homemade devices were "potentially viable," despite failing to explode on the day.
The men claimed their targeted attacks on three tube trains and a bus were a hoax.
More top news
A police constable has been jailed after admitting arranging to have sex with a 15-year-old runway while investigating her disappearance.
Five-year-old Isis was told she could not have her name printed on a personalised Nutella jar as it may be "viewed as inappropriate".
A school has cancelled its upcoming winter dance due to concerns over "dirty dancing."