The three Court of Appeal judges rejected Apple's challenge against an order made by Judge Birss that it must publicise the fact that it had lost the case.
Sir Robin Jacob said: "The grant of such an order is not to punish the party concerned for its behaviour. Nor is it to make it grovel - simply to lose face. The test is whether there is a need to dispel commercial uncertainty."
Ruling that an order was necessary, Sir Robin said Apple must make the position clear "that it acknowledges that the court has decided that these Samsung products do not infringe its registered design."
"The acknowledgement must come from the horse's mouth. Nothing short of that will be sure to do the job completely," he added.
More top news
"He was their for me everyday of my life, he was the best father I could ask for," Rafael Ramos's 13-year-old son said.
Ben Haenow's dreams came true for a second time tonight after his debut song Something I Need was declared the UK's official Christmas No.1.
Temperatures reaching highs of 11 degrees tonight as rain and wind continues in northern England.