The three Court of Appeal judges rejected Apple's challenge against an order made by Judge Birss that it must publicise the fact that it had lost the case.
Sir Robin Jacob said: "The grant of such an order is not to punish the party concerned for its behaviour. Nor is it to make it grovel - simply to lose face. The test is whether there is a need to dispel commercial uncertainty."
Ruling that an order was necessary, Sir Robin said Apple must make the position clear "that it acknowledges that the court has decided that these Samsung products do not infringe its registered design."
"The acknowledgement must come from the horse's mouth. Nothing short of that will be sure to do the job completely," he added.
More top news
Thousands of demonstrators have marched through Boston in opposition to a right-wing rally in the city which was eventually cut short.
Some 1,000 counter-protesters blocked 500 neo-Nazi demonstrators as they tried to march to the site of the death of Hitler ally Rudolf Hess.
Clear skies and lighter winds will bring a chilly night for many