The three Court of Appeal judges rejected Apple's challenge against an order made by Judge Birss that it must publicise the fact that it had lost the case.
Sir Robin Jacob said: "The grant of such an order is not to punish the party concerned for its behaviour. Nor is it to make it grovel - simply to lose face. The test is whether there is a need to dispel commercial uncertainty."
Ruling that an order was necessary, Sir Robin said Apple must make the position clear "that it acknowledges that the court has decided that these Samsung products do not infringe its registered design."
"The acknowledgement must come from the horse's mouth. Nothing short of that will be sure to do the job completely," he added.
More top news
The government's long-awaited decision on which scheme - Heathrow or Gatwick - should get the go-ahead will finally be announced later.
Up to six militants attacked the centre in the Baluchistan province opening fire and detonating explosive vests.
It seems people really do love the spread - and are stocking up on it - after the price row between Marmite supplier Unilever and Tesco.