Campaigners are concerned that simply changing measurements does not do anything to tackle the basic underlying causes of poverty - and may add unhelpful distractions.
They say it could dilute targeting the true causes of poverty - where income remains the key variant.
If child poverty is rising as a result of government policies, then it’s a rethink of government decisions not definitions that’s needed. The relative income poverty measure is the single best indicator of whether ‘we’re all in together.
There is no getting away from the fact that a child's family income is fundamental to their future life chances.
While a holistic approach to tackling child poverty is important, income will always be vital for ending child poverty.
Debating how child poverty is measured must not distract from the urgent need for action to improve the life chances of children currently growing up in families that are languishing below the breadline.
Barnardo's urges the Government to keep measuring income but also to help families climb their way up and out of the poverty trap.
More top news
Spring takes a hike - for the time being
Prime Minister defends royals' decision to give birth in a private hospital - instead of going with the NHS