The judge said the "very modest" damages due to Mr Smith was the very small difference between his contractual salary and the amount actually paid to him during the 12 weeks following his assumption of his new, but reduced, role.
I must admit to real disquiet about the financial outcome of this case.
Mr Smith was taken to task for doing nothing wrong, suspended and subjected to a disciplinary procedure which wrongly found him guilty of gross misconduct, and then demoted to a non-managerial post with an eventual 40% reduction in salary.
The breach of contract which the trust thereby committed was serious and repudiatory.
A conclusion that his damages are limited to less than £100 leaves the uncomfortable feeling that justice has not been done to him in the circumstances.
More top news
The Duke of Cambridge followed in his mother's footsteps today as he visited Commonwealth War Graves in Japan.
Arsenal legend Thierry Henry says it would be a dream to manage the club one day, but admits he's got to learn his trade first.
Across most of England and Wales it will be a clear, chilly night and Friday morning will start off cold but bright until cloud builds up.