The judge said the "very modest" damages due to Mr Smith was the very small difference between his contractual salary and the amount actually paid to him during the 12 weeks following his assumption of his new, but reduced, role.
I must admit to real disquiet about the financial outcome of this case.
Mr Smith was taken to task for doing nothing wrong, suspended and subjected to a disciplinary procedure which wrongly found him guilty of gross misconduct, and then demoted to a non-managerial post with an eventual 40% reduction in salary.
The breach of contract which the trust thereby committed was serious and repudiatory.
A conclusion that his damages are limited to less than £100 leaves the uncomfortable feeling that justice has not been done to him in the circumstances.
More top news
The prime minister should stay in his post even in the case of a Brexit, Michael Howard has said.
Liam Fee suffered prolonged abuse for much of his short life before he was murdered by the two people he relied on for love and protection.
A former model has been jailed for 15 years after she was found guilty of murdering her millionaire ex-lover in his luxury Spanish home.