The decision to refuse compensation was "defective and contrary to natural justice", according to Ian Glen QC, who was representing Barry George.
Despite Mr George's unanimous acquittal by a jury at his retrial, a Ministry of Justice "functionary" had unfairly and unlawfully decided he was "not innocent enough to be compensated".
Mr Glen said that for more than 30 years those acquitted on retrials in similar circumstances had been compensated.
He said: "We are not sure when the policy was changed or whether it was affected by the Barry George case."
The position seemed to have changed in 2008, the year Mr George was acquitted, Mr Glen added.
More top news
Survey finds many children have encountered dangers online but their parents are disregarding the hazards and failing to educate them
Spiders are able to travel across water like ships, using their legs as sails and silk as an anchor, according to new research.
Patient care will suffer if the Chancellor does not announce additional NHS funding in next week's budget, a think tank has warned.