The decision to refuse compensation was "defective and contrary to natural justice", according to Ian Glen QC, who was representing Barry George.
Despite Mr George's unanimous acquittal by a jury at his retrial, a Ministry of Justice "functionary" had unfairly and unlawfully decided he was "not innocent enough to be compensated".
Mr Glen said that for more than 30 years those acquitted on retrials in similar circumstances had been compensated.
He said: "We are not sure when the policy was changed or whether it was affected by the Barry George case."
The position seemed to have changed in 2008, the year Mr George was acquitted, Mr Glen added.
More top news
Health experts warn that over-cooking starchy foods can lead to formation of acrylamide, a substance that may increase the risk of cancer.
South Korean tech giant says faulty batteries were the sole cause of the fires that caused it to pull the Galaxy Note 7 from the shelves.
Theresa May will is set to launch her new industrial strategy as she chairs her first regional cabinet meeting in the northwest.