Solicitor Tessa Gregory, who represented Cait Reilly and 40-year-old unemployed HGV driver Jamieson Wilson, said today's ruling reveals "a lack of transparency" by the Department for Work and Pensions in implementing mandatory work schemes.
The case has revealed that the Department for Work and Pensions was going behind Parliament's back and failing to obtain Parliamentary approval for the various mandatory work schemes that it was introducing.
It also reveals a lack of transparency and fairness in the implementation of these schemes.
The claimants had no information about what could be required of them under the back-to-work schemes.
The Court of Appeal has affirmed the basic constitutional principle that everyone has a right to know and understand why sanctions are being threatened and imposed against them.
More top news
Huge busts of the Grand Tour presenting trio's heads have been spotted being wheeled through the US West Coast and later Sydney.
The mother of the accused had a heart attack after hearing graphic details of the bloody Charleston massacre.
Donald Trump has discussed the "long-standing relationship between Scotland and the United States" in a call with Nicola Sturgeon.