Solicitor Tessa Gregory, who represented Cait Reilly and 40-year-old unemployed HGV driver Jamieson Wilson, said today's ruling reveals "a lack of transparency" by the Department for Work and Pensions in implementing mandatory work schemes.
The case has revealed that the Department for Work and Pensions was going behind Parliament's back and failing to obtain Parliamentary approval for the various mandatory work schemes that it was introducing.
It also reveals a lack of transparency and fairness in the implementation of these schemes.
The claimants had no information about what could be required of them under the back-to-work schemes.
The Court of Appeal has affirmed the basic constitutional principle that everyone has a right to know and understand why sanctions are being threatened and imposed against them.
More top news
Donald Trump has wasted no time making his mark on international matters as well as domestic. So how will his presidency affect the world?
Another cold, frosty and foggy night for many. Northern and western areas will see thickening cloud, patchy rain and milder temperatures.
Temperatures have already plunged to -12C in some parts of the UK this winter - but Thursday could be the coldest day yet.