Writing in the Mail on Sunday, Theresa May warned judges that primary legislation needs to be brought in to enable the Government to deport more foreign criminals.
Unfortunately, some judges evidently do not regard a debate in Parliament on new immigration rules, followed by the unanimous adoption of those rules, as evidence that Parliament actually wants to see those new rules implemented.
One judge, she noted, had justified his decision on the basis that the new guidance had been subject only to "a weak form of Parliamentary scrutiny".
It is essential to democracy that the elected representatives of the people make the laws that govern this country - and not the judges.
Yet some judges seem to believe that they can ignore Parliament's wishes if they think that the procedures for parliamentary scrutiny have been 'weak'. That appears actually to mean that they can ignore Parliament when they think it came to the wrong conclusion.
More top news
Mark Whincup, 50, was well known in North Wales for his magic displays at children's parties and pantomime appearances.
A Royal Navy helicopter has been scrambled to rescue an unconscious toddler, snowed in at a remote farmhouse.
Dippy the Diplodocus now has his own Twitter account as fans fight to keep him in the main hall of the National History Museum.