The Prime Minister has warned it would be "foolish" for Britain to consider abandoning its Trident deterrent because the UK faces an increased threat of a nuclear attack from regimes including North Korea.
In an article for The Daily Telegraph, he has written:
We need our nuclear deterrent as much today as we did when a previous British Government embarked on it over six decades ago.
Of course, the world has changed dramatically.
The Soviet Union no longer exists. But the nuclear threat has not gone away.
In terms of uncertainty and potential risk it has, if anything, increased.
Last year North Korea unveiled a long-range ballistic missile which it claims can reach the whole of the United States.
If this became a reality it would also affect the whole of Europe, including the UK.
Can you be certain how that regime, or indeed any other nuclear armed regime, will develop?
Does anyone seriously argue that it would be wise for Britain, faced with this evolving threat today, to surrender our deterrent?
Mr Cameron adds that in his judgment, it would be "foolish to leave Britain defenceless against a continuing, and growing, nuclear threat."
More top news
"Africa is very important for the United States."
The incident happened at around 8pm local time on Thursday evening.
The Foreign Secretary said "good connections" were important, and suggested the Channel Tunnel might simply be "a first step."