Summarising, on the opening day of Sgt Nightingale's court martial, the prosecution said it was for the board to determine fact and on that basis whether he was guilty or not guilty.
We suggest that the questions that the evidence in this case raises and the matter are straightforward.
Did the defendant put the gun and the ammunition in his bedroom or did somebody else put it there?
If the gun and ammunition belonged to somebody else, how did the defendant miss it?
Is the claim of memory loss in respect of the gun and ammunition the truth or a lie told to try and avoid the consequences of the truth?
Sgt Nightingale, has pleaded not guilty to a charge of possession of a prohibited firearm and 338 rounds of ammunition.
More top news
Not as cold as recent nights - any frost will be confined to parts of Scotland and East Anglia where temperatures will dip below freezing.
A police chief constable has defended his force's handling of child sex allegations against former prime minister Sir Edward Heath.
John Cleese has paid tribute to his "wonderful" Fawlty Towers co-star, Andrew Sachs, following his death at the age of 86.