Summarising, on the opening day of Sgt Nightingale's court martial, the prosecution said it was for the board to determine fact and on that basis whether he was guilty or not guilty.
We suggest that the questions that the evidence in this case raises and the matter are straightforward.
Did the defendant put the gun and the ammunition in his bedroom or did somebody else put it there?
If the gun and ammunition belonged to somebody else, how did the defendant miss it?
Is the claim of memory loss in respect of the gun and ammunition the truth or a lie told to try and avoid the consequences of the truth?
Sgt Nightingale, has pleaded not guilty to a charge of possession of a prohibited firearm and 338 rounds of ammunition.
More top news
The company has seen rocketing sales but still makes a loss, while calls to offer benefits to riders could make its model unviable.
Consumer group Which? has backed the fire brigade's call to end produced of 'fire risk' plastic backed fridges and freezers.
Ryanair are hoping to prevent further flight cancellations by taking back one week of its pilots' holiday.