Summarising, on the opening day of Sgt Nightingale's court martial, the prosecution said it was for the board to determine fact and on that basis whether he was guilty or not guilty.
We suggest that the questions that the evidence in this case raises and the matter are straightforward.
Did the defendant put the gun and the ammunition in his bedroom or did somebody else put it there?
If the gun and ammunition belonged to somebody else, how did the defendant miss it?
Is the claim of memory loss in respect of the gun and ammunition the truth or a lie told to try and avoid the consequences of the truth?
Sgt Nightingale, has pleaded not guilty to a charge of possession of a prohibited firearm and 338 rounds of ammunition.
More top news
Jeremy Corbyn has denied allegations of bullying saying "intimidation is not allowed" in the Labour party.
A gunman who killed nine people and at a Munich shopping centre was German-born and had no links with Islamic State, authorities say.
Torrential rain and flooding has killed 24 people in China and forced tens of thousands from their homes, according to state media.