John Larkin has insisted that his suggestion of an end to prosecutions does not constitute a formal amnesty and it would aid relatives who wanted to find out the truth:
Sometimes the fact of an amnesty can be that that which was a crime ceases to be a crime. That wouldn't be the position here, it would simply be that no criminal proceedings would be possible with respect to those offences.
He implied that in the absence of legal proceedings, relatives of the dead would have a better chance of discovering what had happened to their loved ones.
"We can't really be surprised if people don't tell us as long as the theoretical threat of prosecution remains," he said.
More top news
Birmingham children's services is under the spotlight again after the death of the toddler at the hands of her legal guardian.
A chilly evening and night with clear skies and tomorrow a little more cloud through Scotland and Northern Ireland again.
Researchers believe the new technique could help improve the chances of IVF, of which only around one in four attempts are successful.