John Larkin has insisted that his suggestion of an end to prosecutions does not constitute a formal amnesty and it would aid relatives who wanted to find out the truth:
Sometimes the fact of an amnesty can be that that which was a crime ceases to be a crime. That wouldn't be the position here, it would simply be that no criminal proceedings would be possible with respect to those offences.
He implied that in the absence of legal proceedings, relatives of the dead would have a better chance of discovering what had happened to their loved ones.
"We can't really be surprised if people don't tell us as long as the theoretical threat of prosecution remains," he said.
More top news
Work to recover the wreckage of downed Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 has finally finished.
Five political leaders have agreed to tackle young people's questions in a series of live Q&As on YouTube. Here's how you can get involved…
The star says she has a "great relationship" with her ex and it's "nice for the children that they know Mum and Dad are still there."