John Larkin has insisted that his suggestion of an end to prosecutions does not constitute a formal amnesty and it would aid relatives who wanted to find out the truth:
Sometimes the fact of an amnesty can be that that which was a crime ceases to be a crime. That wouldn't be the position here, it would simply be that no criminal proceedings would be possible with respect to those offences.
He implied that in the absence of legal proceedings, relatives of the dead would have a better chance of discovering what had happened to their loved ones.
"We can't really be surprised if people don't tell us as long as the theoretical threat of prosecution remains," he said.
More top news
Two students and their climbing instructor are feared dead after an avalanche hit a school party in Japan.
The US has strongly condemned Russia's treatment of protesters after the largest anti-government protests in years swept the country.
Prosecutors in South Korea are seeking a warrant to arrest former president Park Geun-hye on corruption allegations.