John Larkin has insisted that his suggestion of an end to prosecutions does not constitute a formal amnesty and it would aid relatives who wanted to find out the truth:
Sometimes the fact of an amnesty can be that that which was a crime ceases to be a crime. That wouldn't be the position here, it would simply be that no criminal proceedings would be possible with respect to those offences.
He implied that in the absence of legal proceedings, relatives of the dead would have a better chance of discovering what had happened to their loved ones.
"We can't really be surprised if people don't tell us as long as the theoretical threat of prosecution remains," he said.
More top news
Sex and drugs are off limits for undercover police, official guidelines published for the first time state.
Nicola Sturgeon will hold talks with European Parliament president Martin Schulz in Brussels today.
IKEA is recalling almost 36 million chests and dressers in the US and Canada after the deaths of three children.