John Larkin has insisted that his suggestion of an end to prosecutions does not constitute a formal amnesty and it would aid relatives who wanted to find out the truth:
Sometimes the fact of an amnesty can be that that which was a crime ceases to be a crime. That wouldn't be the position here, it would simply be that no criminal proceedings would be possible with respect to those offences.
He implied that in the absence of legal proceedings, relatives of the dead would have a better chance of discovering what had happened to their loved ones.
"We can't really be surprised if people don't tell us as long as the theoretical threat of prosecution remains," he said.
More top news
Firefighters rescued 42 people after they became stranded in the Asda supermarket in Kilmarnock by heavy flooding.
Farmer Gareth Wyn Jones is hoping for a festive online hit with footage of sheepdog Cap rounding up sheep.
For one young Australian, Santa Claus brought the greatest present of all this Christmas - the gift of life.