John Larkin has insisted that his suggestion of an end to prosecutions does not constitute a formal amnesty and it would aid relatives who wanted to find out the truth:
Sometimes the fact of an amnesty can be that that which was a crime ceases to be a crime. That wouldn't be the position here, it would simply be that no criminal proceedings would be possible with respect to those offences.
He implied that in the absence of legal proceedings, relatives of the dead would have a better chance of discovering what had happened to their loved ones.
"We can't really be surprised if people don't tell us as long as the theoretical threat of prosecution remains," he said.
More top news
Brendan Rodgers has been sacked by Liverpool after the 1-1 Merseyside derby draw with Everton
As the party says it represents the working public, thousands of anti-austerity demonstrators show they don't quite see it that way.
Alex Salmond found himself in a stand-off with airline staff after booking on to a flight under the name James Kirk.