Environment Agency chairman Lord Smith said there is "no bottomless purse" on flood defences, meaning that "difficult decisions" had to be made on which areas to protect.
Yes, agricultural land matters and we do whatever we can with what we have to make sure it is protected. Rules from successive governments give the highest priority to lives and homes; and I think most people would agree that this is the right approach.
But this involves tricky issues of policy and priority; town or country, front rooms or farmland?
Flood defences cost money; and how much should the taxpayer be prepared to spend on different places, communities and livelihoods - in Somerset, Lincolnshire, Yorkshire, or East Anglia?
There's no bottomless purse, and we need to make difficult but sensible choices about where and what we try to protect.
More top news
Elise Christie's Winter Olympics ended in dramatic fashion as she crashed out of the women's 1000m before being disqualified.
Bloating is a sign of ovarian cancer, but a poll has found that some women would be more likely to change their diet than visit their GP.
Jeremy Corbyn met Jan Sarkocy in the 1980's leading a number of questions being asked about the Labour Leader in recent days.