Environment Agency chairman Lord Smith said there is "no bottomless purse" on flood defences, meaning that "difficult decisions" had to be made on which areas to protect.
Yes, agricultural land matters and we do whatever we can with what we have to make sure it is protected. Rules from successive governments give the highest priority to lives and homes; and I think most people would agree that this is the right approach.
But this involves tricky issues of policy and priority; town or country, front rooms or farmland?
Flood defences cost money; and how much should the taxpayer be prepared to spend on different places, communities and livelihoods - in Somerset, Lincolnshire, Yorkshire, or East Anglia?
There's no bottomless purse, and we need to make difficult but sensible choices about where and what we try to protect.
More top news
A British Tamil cricketer has died after being hit in the chest by a ball.
A mix of sunshine and frequent showers is in store for the rest of today.
Dozens of plots have been thwarted since July 7, 2005, but are we any less vulnerable to terror attacks?