Environment Agency chairman Lord Smith said there is "no bottomless purse" on flood defences, meaning that "difficult decisions" had to be made on which areas to protect.
Yes, agricultural land matters and we do whatever we can with what we have to make sure it is protected. Rules from successive governments give the highest priority to lives and homes; and I think most people would agree that this is the right approach.
But this involves tricky issues of policy and priority; town or country, front rooms or farmland?
Flood defences cost money; and how much should the taxpayer be prepared to spend on different places, communities and livelihoods - in Somerset, Lincolnshire, Yorkshire, or East Anglia?
There's no bottomless purse, and we need to make difficult but sensible choices about where and what we try to protect.
More top news
A keeper killed by a tiger at a zoo in Cambridgeshire has been named in reports and described as the "shining light" of her workplace.
The two women charged with murdering the half-brother of North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un have appeared in court in Malaysia.
More than one million families will benefit from Labour's plan to overhaul "patchy" childcare provision, the party has said.