Judge Mark Brown, sitting at Liverpool Crown Court, said the recent changes to the law that increased the maximum sentence for people who allowed a dog to carry out a fatal attack on a person do not apply to this case.
The tougher penalties, which mean dog owners can face 14 years in prison, were brought into force last month but Sulley and Woods' offences predate that ruling.
The judge can only sentence in this case according to the old guidelines and not retrospectively.
More top news
Misty low cloud and some patchy fog again tonight but with mild air, temperatures where you'd expect by day rather than by night
Lincoln City and Millwall have learned their FA Cup quarter-final fate after their giantkilling antics.
The Good Morning Britain presenter announced he would host the RTS awards because of the "silly noise" of a campaign to ban him.