Judge Mark Brown, sitting at Liverpool Crown Court, said the recent changes to the law that increased the maximum sentence for people who allowed a dog to carry out a fatal attack on a person do not apply to this case.
The tougher penalties, which mean dog owners can face 14 years in prison, were brought into force last month but Sulley and Woods' offences predate that ruling.
The judge can only sentence in this case according to the old guidelines and not retrospectively.
More top news
Leonie Granger deliberately targeted Mehmet Hassan, who was robbed and kicked to death by two men she let into his flat.
Pop and soul singer Sam Smith has cancelled the rest of his Australian tour after doctors discovered a haemorrhage on his vocal cords.
A new picture released by Nasa shows that one of Saturn's moons looks very much like a bath sponge floating in space