Judge Mark Brown, sitting at Liverpool Crown Court, said the recent changes to the law that increased the maximum sentence for people who allowed a dog to carry out a fatal attack on a person do not apply to this case.
The tougher penalties, which mean dog owners can face 14 years in prison, were brought into force last month but Sulley and Woods' offences predate that ruling.
The judge can only sentence in this case according to the old guidelines and not retrospectively.
More top news
The ex-US secretary of state and presidential candidate spoke at Trinity College Dublin.
The struggling department store chain secured the backing of more than 75% of creditors, including landlords, for a CVA.
Mohiussunnath Chowdhury told the Old Bailey he expected to be shot dead by police or soldiers when he produced it at Buckingham Palace.