Judge Mark Brown, sitting at Liverpool Crown Court, said the recent changes to the law that increased the maximum sentence for people who allowed a dog to carry out a fatal attack on a person do not apply to this case.
The tougher penalties, which mean dog owners can face 14 years in prison, were brought into force last month but Sulley and Woods' offences predate that ruling.
The judge can only sentence in this case according to the old guidelines and not retrospectively.
More top news
A newborn baby girl has been killed by dogs after they attacked her while she was lying on a sofa.
It is plausible to say we haven't had our last vote or say on the nature of Britain's relationship with the EU.
After Roy Hodgson's resignation following England's humiliating exit from Euro 2016, who are the leading contenders to replace him?