Judge Mark Brown, sitting at Liverpool Crown Court, said the recent changes to the law that increased the maximum sentence for people who allowed a dog to carry out a fatal attack on a person do not apply to this case.
The tougher penalties, which mean dog owners can face 14 years in prison, were brought into force last month but Sulley and Woods' offences predate that ruling.
The judge can only sentence in this case according to the old guidelines and not retrospectively.
More top news
Autumn weather arrives for the early part of the weekend. Brighter and drier later.
The bombs, which are designed to penetrate military bunkers, completely destroy buildings and leave people buried under tons of rubble.
Loretta Lynch says she believes that the world has the resources to deal with the Syrian conflict and resulting issues.