Judge Mark Brown, sitting at Liverpool Crown Court, said the recent changes to the law that increased the maximum sentence for people who allowed a dog to carry out a fatal attack on a person do not apply to this case.
The tougher penalties, which mean dog owners can face 14 years in prison, were brought into force last month but Sulley and Woods' offences predate that ruling.
The judge can only sentence in this case according to the old guidelines and not retrospectively.
More top news
Low pressure keeps our weather unsettled into the weekend
A Royal Marine from Northern Ireland who built explosives for an Irish republican paramilitary group had 43 hides, a court has heard.
A gay man has spoken of pain he suffered as a young boy when doctors gave him chemicals and electric shocks in attempt to 'cure' him.