Judge Mark Brown, sitting at Liverpool Crown Court, said the recent changes to the law that increased the maximum sentence for people who allowed a dog to carry out a fatal attack on a person do not apply to this case.
The tougher penalties, which mean dog owners can face 14 years in prison, were brought into force last month but Sulley and Woods' offences predate that ruling.
The judge can only sentence in this case according to the old guidelines and not retrospectively.
More top news
The Trussell Trust said its network distributed more than 1.3 million three-day food supplies in the year to March.
The statue of the suffragist holding a banner reading ‘Courage calls for courage everywhere’ will be the first of a woman in Parliament Squa
A judge has said doctors at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital could stop providing life-support treatment to the 23-month-old.