Tying workers to one business when they are employed on a zero-hour contract is "rigid and archaic", according to a business chief.
Director general of the Institute of Directors (IoD), Simon Walker, came out in support of Vince Cable's move to ban the use of exclusivity clause but allow businesses to continue to use zero-hours contracts.
The IoD has long campaigned against the exploitation of employees on zero hours contracts. Tying an employee into an exclusivity cause can turn a flexible contract into a rigid and archaic one.
The whole point about the flexibility offered by zero hours contracts is that they allow an individual to capitalise on their own time, labour and energy.
We're pleased that the Government recognises the enormous value that flexible contracts can bring to both employer and employee, but at the same time it's right to ensure that exploitation is stamped out.
More top news
Scientists used modern forensic techniques to review the 'cold case' and determine the victim was probably killed by two blows to the head.
US computer science expert says "endpoint" of lethal drone technology is killer robots that choose targets via artificial intelligence.
All leave for doctors in India has been cancelled as the death toll - and temperatures - continue to rise.