Tying workers to one business when they are employed on a zero-hour contract is "rigid and archaic", according to a business chief.
Director general of the Institute of Directors (IoD), Simon Walker, came out in support of Vince Cable's move to ban the use of exclusivity clause but allow businesses to continue to use zero-hours contracts.
The IoD has long campaigned against the exploitation of employees on zero hours contracts. Tying an employee into an exclusivity cause can turn a flexible contract into a rigid and archaic one.
The whole point about the flexibility offered by zero hours contracts is that they allow an individual to capitalise on their own time, labour and energy.
We're pleased that the Government recognises the enormous value that flexible contracts can bring to both employer and employee, but at the same time it's right to ensure that exploitation is stamped out.
More top news
Soloman Bygraves followed 93-year-old Stanley Evans into his block of flats and pushed him over as he lunged for his wallet.
Scottish Power has accepted a 12-day sales ban after the company failed to meet Ofgem's customer service targets.
John Whitbread sold £10 raffle tickets for the holiday after his fiancee of two years jilted him and he decided not to cancel the trip.