Tying workers to one business when they are employed on a zero-hour contract is "rigid and archaic", according to a business chief.
Director general of the Institute of Directors (IoD), Simon Walker, came out in support of Vince Cable's move to ban the use of exclusivity clause but allow businesses to continue to use zero-hours contracts.
The IoD has long campaigned against the exploitation of employees on zero hours contracts. Tying an employee into an exclusivity cause can turn a flexible contract into a rigid and archaic one.
The whole point about the flexibility offered by zero hours contracts is that they allow an individual to capitalise on their own time, labour and energy.
We're pleased that the Government recognises the enormous value that flexible contracts can bring to both employer and employee, but at the same time it's right to ensure that exploitation is stamped out.
More top news
Between 2011 and 2014 reports of self-harm among British girls aged between 13 and 16 rose by 68%, according to new research.
Justin Trudeau has paid a tearful tribute to Gord Downie, the lead singer of Tragically Hip, who died aged 53 from brain cancer.
Vehicle imports and exports could be seriously affected by a no-deal Brexit scenario.