Presiding Officer Elin Jones has told the Senedd that AMs, including ministers, should not resort to personal insults in the Assembly.Read the full story ›
The Assembly's Presiding Officer has written to the Prime Minister demanding urgent clarification and consultation about reports that the UK Government's electronic surveillance agency, GCHQ, is no longer banned from spying on AMs.
Until last year, GCHQ extended the so-called Wilson doctrine, which forbids targeting MPs, to include members of devolved parliaments and assemblies. The doctrine is named after Harold Wilson, the Prime Minister who ruled in 1966 that the security services could not spy on MPs.
As Presiding Officer of the National Assembly for Wales, I am responsible for safeguarding the interests of all Members and I believe that they should be afforded the same treatment and status by the United Kingdom's security services, especially in regard to communications that they may have with constituents, as parliamentarians at Westminster.
The change of policy emerged during a court case about the alleged interception of communications to and from the Green MP Caroline Lucas, Green Peer Baroness Jones of Mouscombe and the former Respect MP George Galloway. When the exemptions under the Wilson doctrine were reviewed, it was decided that it no longer applied at all to Welsh Assembly Members, Members of the Scottish Parliament and Members of the Northern Ireland Assembly.
The Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament and the First Minister of Scotland have also written to the Prime Minister. There's concern in Scotland that the change of policy may have legitimised spying on the 'yes' campaign during last year's independence referendum. Plaid Cymru has called on Carwyn Jones to join the protests to David Cameron. The First Minister says he is concerned by the possible infringement of AMs' privacy.
It’s completely unacceptable that any communications between members elected to the devolved administrations and the people they represent might be monitored in this way. I’d like to hear from the UK Government about why this major rule change happened and why the devolved administrations were not consulted about it.
A question about UFO sightings at Cardiff Airport drew an unusual response from the Welsh Government - in alien language klingonRead the full story ›
First Minister Carwyn Jones refused to commit to the idea of a referendum on the Welsh Government levying income tax when he responded to Stephen Crabb's speech. He also rejected the idea that the latest package of powers should mark the completion of what the Welsh Secretary had called the "devolution journey".
Progress has been made but there is still a long way to go. Particularly not just in terms of Wales but of the UK as a whole. There is much work that needs to be done in order to get the constitution right and to make sure that the United Kingdom reflects the four nations that are part of the UK state.
Plaid Cymru leader Leanne Wood complained that while Scotland was getting the "going rate", Wales was getting third rate treatment. She said the Welsh Secretary couldn't expect a stable devolution settlement if Wales wasn't treated as an equal partner in the United Kingdom.
I ask for you to offer any justification in your response for why the people of Wales should not be given the same funding per head as the people of Scotland. The same principle applies to responsibilities. Why does the Secretary of State believe that Scotland’s natural resources should be in the hands of the people of Scotland, but Wales’ natural resources should remain in the hands of Westminster politicians? Are we a less able people?It is these Westminster puppet strings that have held Wales back for far too long.
Welsh Secretary Stephen Crabb has told AMs that the Assembly is getting "the most far reaching and significant package of powers ever devolved to Wales" and urged them to use those powers rather than spend their time demanding more. He said the Welsh Government using its existing power to call a referendum to win right to levy income tax was a crucial part of that process.
I believe now it is time that the Welsh Government demonstrates its own commitment to the whole package by making progress on the income tax raising powers that are already available to it.
There is no other Parliament in the world that does not have responsibility for raising money as well as spending it.
In 1773 the Sons of Liberty smashed up the tea ships in Boston Harbour with the rallying cry “No taxation without representation”. Here in Wales we have something of a reverse situation: representation and full law-making powers but without responsibility for significant taxation.
I firmly believe the Welsh public are hungry for us to move forwards a nation and for this place – this National Assembly, this Parliament – to become a true forum of debate, resolution and a sense of purpose and action, the articulator of our national ambition for economic growth, wealth creation, educational achievement, first-class health outcomes. For it to provide solutions on all the issues that really matter to the people it serves, not a vehicle for a never-ending conversation about more powers, or the generator of some dull consensus that settles on mediocrity where funding is always deployed as the great national excuse for not achieving our potential.
He added that during the recent election campaign, not once on any doorstep across Wales was he asked about more powers or devolution. But he said that as a first step, the UK government will devolve decision making on planning applications for all onshore wind farms.
Mr Crabb said he rejected the idea of devolution as a never-ending journey. Instead of demanding yet more powers in future, the Assembly should consolidate its role in Welsh national life by becoming "not just a forum for grievance but a cockpit of resolution and action".