The developers of the waste incinerator planned at Javelin Park on the outskirts of Gloucester say it will create 300 construction jobs and around 40 permanent jobs when the project is completed.
Urbaser Balfour Beatty (UBB) say the plant will generate enough electricity to power approximately 26,000 homes. It will be fuelled by waste that would otherwise go to landfill, and save council tax payers £150m over 25 years.
Stroud District Council has expressed its disappointment following the decision by Secretary of State Eric Pickles to give planning permission for the waste incinerator at Javelin Park, in Haresfield.
The district council had objected to the incinerator due to its impact on the adjacent area of outstanding natural beauty, its impact on the nearby Hunts Grove development and the inefficiency of the solution when compared to other options in terms of converting waste to energy and minimising carbon emissions.
The Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has overruled Gloucestershire County Council to give permission for an incinerator to treat 150,000 tonnes of household waste.
Urbaser Balfour Beatty (UBB) was awarded a contract to design and build the facility at Javelin Park in February 2013. However, the county council's planning committee refused planning permission and UBB appealed to the Secretary of State.
Residents nearby claim the development will be the size of Gloucester Cathedral with a 70m high chimney looming over homes.
Currently over half of residents' household waste is sent to landfill, which creates harmful greenhouse gases and in 2013/14 cost £9 million in tax.
The facility will make an important change in the way Gloucestershire deals with the household waste of its 600,000 residents, diverting over 92 per cent of waste from landfill. The council says it will make a significant impact on tackling climate change by removing 40,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide and save local people more than £150million over the next 25 years.
Gloucester City Council has voted to set up a committee to look into a 'plan B' for waste disposal in the county.
It follows a recent decision by the planning committee to reject an application to build a waste incinerator at Javelin Park.
The committee will now look at other methods of disposing household waste such as the mechanical and biological systems already used at Avonmouth in Bristol.
The company behind a controversial waste incinerator that was turned down by councillors in Gloucester say they will appeal the decision.
Urbaser Balfour Beatty wanted to build the £500m plant at Javelin Park. More than a hundred people packed a meeting last night, which lasted 11 hours.
Our Gloucestershire correspondent Ken Goodwin reports:
In his first interview since Gloucestershire County Council's planning committee unanimously voted against plans for the incinerator at Javelin Park, Councillor Stan Waddington, the council's waste champion, admits that he is disappointed.
He has been a fervent supporter of the waste incinerator scheme, and still thinks it is the best way of getting rid of waste:
Our Gloucestershire Correspondent Ken Goodwin reports from Kingsholm after councillors unanimously rejected plans for a £500m waste incinerator at Javelin Park:
Councillors have unanimously rejected plans for a hugely controversial waste incinerator near Gloucester.
More than 100 people packed a planning meeting today which lasted 11 hours.
Protesters claimed the £500m facility at Javelin Park at Haresfield would have been bigger than Gloucester Cathedral.
More than a hundred people packed a planning meeting today, where councillors were deciding whether or not to give the go-ahead to a hugely controversial waste incinerator near Gloucester.
Protesters claim the £500 million facility at Javelin Park at Haresfield will be bigger than Gloucester Cathedral.
But the council says it's right to consider other alternatives to using landfill. Here's our Gloucestershire Correspondent, Ken Goodwin:
Sue Oppenheimer from GlosVAIN is one of the campaigners against the plans for a waste incinerator on the edge of Gloucester. She is concerned about the impact on the landscape as well as the costs incurred.