A Met police officer accused of sawing and smashing his way through a suspect's windscreen has been cleared at Southwark Crown Court of destroying property, common assault and possession of a blade after sawing and smashing his way through a suspect's windscreen using a multi-tool.
Joshua Savage, 28, was accused of attacking Leon Fontana's Ford Fiesta with a baton before cutting the glass with a lock knife in 2016.
The incident in Camden was filmed by Mr Fontana and shared widely online at the time.
Police mistakenly thought the driver was a potentially violent drug dealer who may have had a weapon and only a provisional licence.
Savage claimed on Wednesday that what he did was necessary to protect himself, his colleagues and the public. The police officer said he acted lawfully and proportionately when Mr Fontana refused to step out of his vehicle, and that it was common practice for Metropolitan Police officers to carry knives on duty.
On Friday, Mr Savage was cleared of one count of assault by beating and one count of damaging property at Southwark Crown Court.
He was also cleared of possession of a bladed article for having the multi-tool, which is not a police-issued piece of kit.
In his evidence, Mr Savage claimed the sharp rise in violent crime in London is down to officers being too afraid to make arrests in case they face a backlash.
"It was as a situation where I was trying to gain (Mr Fontana's) compliance, trying to speak to him - absolutely the situation didn't unfold the way I would have liked," he said.
The court heard that Mr Savage had run a check on the vehicle by radio and learned that it had previously been used to make off from police.
He continued: "I knew I was in a police-unfriendly area, potentially with a person who could present a risk to myself or my colleagues.
"I knew the driver was potentially someone who might make off from us, so I approached the vehicle feeling very anxious."
Mr Savage said he was unable to see into the car properly because of its tinted windows.
"I believed the driver to be Mr Dixon. We knew he presented a risk to police officers and the public in that he would be prepared to drive off and cause a pursuit."
He added: "The subject was in a vehicle, a vehicle is a killing machine and he was completely in control of that vehicle."
Mr Savage said that when Mr Fontana started filming him, it seemed like he wanted to repeat the whole exchange from the beginning "for the benefit of the camera and his YouTube fans".
"This is the problem we are seeing throughout London - police officers are more reluctant to deal with things because they are scared of what might come afterwards.
"Hence why we are seeing gang members not being disrupted and the rise in violent crime."
Mr Savage claimed that "the majority" of response officers carry their own bladed tools on duty.
He said his job required a "cutting implement" for acts such as slicing seat belts off trapped car passengers in emergency situations.
Mr Savage said his multi-tool was always clearly displayed on his belt and that he had never tried to conceal it because it is bright yellow.
In the footage of the alleged assault, when Mr Fontana refuses to leave his vehicle, the Metropolitan Police officer can be heard saying in footage played to the jury, "Get out of the car" and, "You're not allowed to drive it".Mr Fontana, who placed his keys on the dashboard, replies: "I've got a licence and insurance" and says he is filming for his own safety.
In his evidence, Mr Fontana said: "I thought if I left that car I would have been in danger certainly.
"I certainly wasn't getting out to a police officer with a knife and a cosh in his hand."
Mr Savage, of Hermon Hill, Wanstead, north-east London, has been on restricted duties with the Met since the incident.
Following the jury's verdict, Judge Christopher Hehir raised the issue of the £175 cost the complainant was forced to pay to have his windscreen repaired.
He said: "I am not seeking to go behind the jury's verdict but it would seem to me that the decent thing for the Metropolitan Police to do would be to compensate Mr Fontana for the damage to the windscreen of that vehicle.
"At the end of the day it was his car, he was entitled to drive it on a public road and he ended up having his windscreen smashed in, and that wasn't his fault and I don't think it's fair that he should have to pay the cost of it."