A convicted child rapist with a string of other convictions was paid almost £10,000 by police to spy on parties where they suspected under-age girls would be plied with drugs and alcohol, before being sexually abused.
The man - known only as XY - was recruited by Northumbria Police despite being a convicted sex offender who had drugged and raped an under-age girl, and then invited another man to also rape her.
The use and payment of XY emerged during the pre-trial hearings against a gang who plied young girls and vulnerable women with drugs and alcohol, before raping and sexually abusing them at parties.
During the pre-trial hearings, defence barristers attempted to halt the proceedings against 10 of the accused, arguing that the public's confidence in the justice system would be undermined if the trials went ahead, given that the rapist XY had acted as an informant, formally known as a Covert Human Intelligence Source, or "CHIS".
The amount paid by Northumbria Police to child rapist informant known as 'XY' for information
Robin Patton, representing one of the defendants, said XY was paid £9,680 over 21 months by Northumbria Police for informing.
Mr Patton argued that XY was subject to a suspended sentence when he was deployed by police in 2014 and said police claimed they carried out a risk assessment, but that the "very next day" after he was recruited, XY was in court for a dishonesty offence.
After he was recruited, XY was arrested in September 2015 on suspicion ofinciting sexual activity with a child after a teenage girl claimed a manapproached her and made an indecent proposition.
After taking part in an identity parade, XY was told he would face no further action.
XY, who was on the Sex Offenders' Register, also failed to notify police he had moved house, Mr Patton said.
Mr Patton said: "I have tried to think of convictions that make him lesssuitable to act as a CHIS in an operation of this sort... I have not been ableto."
David Hislop QC, representing another defendant, said XY had 13 previousconvictions, including 26 offences of dishonesty.
During the legal submissions, XY gave evidence to the court and made a series of lurid allegations against the police, including claims of racism and that he was asked to plant drugs.
But Judge Penny Moreland rejected his evidence in its entirity, describing itas "inherently unreliable" and "clearly dishonest".
In the ensuing trials of the gang, XY did not give any evidence.
XY claimed he was recruited because he acted as an informal taxi driver forsome of the defendants.
"I would get to know where they pick up their drugs, where the parties were," he said.
At another point, he claimed: "I was chilling with the boys. I had to make itlook like I was their friend."
Giving evidence from behind a screen, and with the public gallery cleared, XY said he had been a paid informant for six or seven years.
He told the abuse of process hearing that police tasked him "to find out what was going on in the area, when parties were taking place, where there was criminal activity".
"There were certain individuals they were very interested in, which I wasclose to," he said.
"When I worked for Sanctuary I actually believed I was doing good. I never, ever thought it was bad. I enjoyed it."
During one trial at Newcastle Crown Court in 2015, he claimed he was encouraged by a police handler to listen in on private meetings between defendants and their legal representatives.
He claimed at one point to have discovered a barrister had a crucial DVDcontaining evidence, and when he mentioed it to his handlers he was given a "standing ovation".
As well as receiving money, police informants were given "texts" - secretletters that could be put before a judge if they were convicted of an offence to gain a more lenient sentence.
XY claimed he was told the text he would receive for the DVD information was "gold, silver, bronze... diamond" and that the text "comes from high up".
Judge Moreland turned down the abuse of process application, ordering that the trials of the defendants should not be thrown out.
XY did not give evidence in any of the Operation Sanctuary trials.
Judge Moreland added: "I do not regard myself as bound to act on evidence which is so inherently unreliable, so lacking in credibility and in my view so clearlydishonest."
She also found that there was no evidence that XY was guilty of any sexualmisconduct towards any complainants in the cases.
XY had told the court he went to one or two parties but left "because I knewwhat was coming, before it was coming".
What has Northumbria Police's response been to the use of XY?
Northumbria Police have defended their decision to pay XY to spy on parties.
While the police knew "concerns were raised" about their use of XY to try and help them uncover sexual abuse, he helped them "prevent and detect some of the most serious crimes occurring in our communities" which "would not have been possible through conventional methods", Northumbria Police Chief Constable Steve Ashman said.
He continued: “XY was an authorised Covert Human Intelligence Source (CHIS), an informant, who was able to report on criminality including CSE.
"He was a convicted rapist and to some of us the thought of the police engaging with such a person and paying them for information may appear repugnant, however he proved he was in a position whereby he could, and did, alert police to situations which allowed them to prevent offending and provide safeguarding measures towards potential victims.
"The lawful and regulated use of such tactics is always overseen by a senior police officer and is also subject to review by an independent body.
"Furthermore in this case the handling of XY by Northumbria Police was the subject of an independent investigation by the IPCC in which no misconduct was found nor any recommendations made whatsoever.
“In the case of XY it is clear that his relationships with others have allowed the police to prevent and detect some of the most serious crimes occurring in our communities, this would not have been possible through conventional methods."
Chief Con Ashman - who is due to retire soon - added that the force's use of XY was the subject of an investigation by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), "in which no misconduct was found nor any recommendations made whatsoever".
Chief Constable of Northumbria Police Steve Ashman defended his force's decision to pay the informant and would do so again.
The force's police and crime commissioner Vera Baird said the decision to use XY was a difficult one.
"I would have wished this man not to be used, in particular because of his conviction for rape," she explained.
"But, I have questioned the chief constable and, in liaison with other senior officers, Mr Ashman has satisfied me that the difficult moral decision to use the informant was taken with care and with particular regard to the welfare of victims.
"I am assured that the information this male supplied has contributed to the investigation and hence to the prosecution of these dangerous men, that it could not have been obtained in any other way, and that it will have ensured the speedier rescue and safeguarding of vulnerable women who would otherwise have continued to suffer abuse."
What has the response of others been?
The NSPCC said it was "appalled" a paedophile had been deployed by Northumbria Police.
A spokesperson for the children's charity, Jon Brown, said: "We are appalled to learn that police paid a child rapist and planted him in the midst of vulnerable young girls.
"You just couldn't make it up.
"It beggars belief that it would ever have been considered, let aloneapproved, and serious questions must be asked about the force's approach to child sexual exploitation operations.
"However good the force's intentions, their misguided actions run entirelycounter to all current child protection procedures and what we know about sex offenders and could have compromised this investigation.
"What we mustn't forget in all this is the victims who were preyed on by aseries of despicable men for their own sexual gratification. It is right thatthese men are now behind bars."
"Groomers trick young people into believing that they have chosen to be inthis situation and will use them however they like for their own twistedpleasure.
"We want every child and young person to understand what sexualexploitation is, and know that it is categorically not their fault."