The head of the NSPCC, who is leading a review into the Home Office's handling of abuse allegations, said failing to report crimes against children should be an offence.
Not mentioning abuse in order to save an organisation's reputation should be a crime, chief executive Peter Wanless told the BBC.
If someone consciously knows that there is a crime committed against a child, and does nothing about it because they put the reputation of the organisation above the safety of that child, that should be a criminal offence.
Mr Wanless's comments were "hugely welcome" and "a really significant U-turn for the NSPCC", the chief executive of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood, Peter Saunders, said.
The charity had previously said it felt "criminal sanction against those who hesitate is unfair".
More top news
Rescuing a cat from a tree may seem like a mundane task for California firefighters but not when the cat is a very large mountain lion.
Labour MPs are making a statement 'relating to the future of British politics'.
Could the longest rumoured split in a major British political party since the creation of the SDP almost 40 years ago happen on Monday?